I just want to point out that even with generous need based aid, colleges operate under the assumption that there are four sources of financing-
Past income (i.e. your savings, put aside for college, plus other assets except for your designated retirement assets)
Current income (which is what all of you are focused on right now, i.e. “how can we afford to spend half our salaries on tuition?”)
Future income (i.e. loans)
Self-help- student earnings- Work Study if your kid qualifies, summer job and working during the semester if not.
Families who don’t want to use their savings on college- your prerogative. Kids who don’t want to work during the school year-- your prerogative. Families who believe that educational loans are the source of all evil- your prerogative.
But unless you are Bill Gates, NOBODY expects to finance their kids educations by writing a check every month out of their current salary. Having your kid commute- a fine option. Living on campus Freshman year and then commuting for the rest- a fine option. Taking out the federal max for student loans, and planning to get a job and live at home AFTER graduating to pay off the loans with an accelerated timetable- a fine option.
But the focus on “how can we spend so much of our salary on tuition” obfuscates the fact that colleges look at many, many factors in coming up with an aid package. Of course- it’s unfair to a family who has no savings to liquidate. It’s unfair to a family where the breadwinner is three years from retirement, and it’s unfair to a student who’s had medical issues who is likely NOT going to be able to study and hold down a part time job during college, etc, fill in your own circumstances.
But I know a family where the parents are “unemployed” (by choice) who were horrified that even though they have minimal income, they were deemed full pay at their kids college. Hurrah, the system works. They’ve got huge assets due to an early retirement and a big payday from deferred compensation, they’ve got a massive, paid off home, and guess what- their kid can take out a loan and go to community college if the parents choose not to liquidate some of their assets to write a check.
So yes- unfair. There is no financial aid fairy. There is just a complex system which tries to distribute limited funds in as reasonable a way as possible.
The media broo-haha over student loans (everyone loves the stories about the Barista paying off $200K in student loans $10 at a time) ignores the fact that MOST students pay off their loans. MOST students are CLEARLY better off by having borrowed (college graduates make more money over time, and borrowing to get a degree speeds up the rate at which an individual gets access to those higher paying jobs). MOST students find a way to live economically even while borrowing (no Cancun at Spring Break or the pricey dorms with air conditioning and private rooms). And the real enemy here-- the for profit colleges which prey on low income, first gen students promising that a “degree” in recreation management, tourism, court reporting, etc. despite the reality that these kids could get those jobs WITHOUT the bogus degrees and WITHOUT having exhausted their Pell AND taken out loans.
College is expensive, but current income is only one piece of the puzzle.