<p>hey tubaman it was times -1. i think thats wat ur talking about.</p>
<p>Hey guys wat is -15 Eng, -5 math, -5 reading, -5 science. ??</p>
<p>I think that would be like 29-31</p>
<p>omg hopping for 31. for math the only one i guessed was the matrix, and reading and science i am pretty confident about but for English i didnt study/practice.</p>
<p>edit: also does everyone in the room have the same test?</p>
<p>i think i messed up on the reading and science</p>
<p>OMG! the science killed me! i guessed like 10 questions due to time constraint! and the lady who watched over us kept talking to her friend!! I guessed like 8 on the math, 4 on english, and around 5-6 on the reading.</p>
<p>I am definately not getting the score i hoped!</p>
<p>i thought the english and reading sections weren't too bad, my essay was ok (i hope), & science wasn't as bad as i thought it would be (but i still had to guess on a few bcuz of the time constraints)... math, however, killed me...</p>
<p>I think English and Reading were good for me. 32+ on each of those maybe?
Math... Eh. No idea. Somewhere in the 20's probably, unfortuantely.
Science... Oh. My. Bad. Very. Bad. I had to just pick a letter on too many...
Writing - Good, I think. The prompt I had was an easy one to write about.</p>
<p>jadore_isabella - Can I ask what state or town you took that in? Because that sounds EXACTLY like my proctor..........</p>
<p>English: no guesses (I AM the grammar Nazi =( lol... it's a curse and a blessing), so a 36 unless I misread something.
Math: 1 guess, already confirmed that I guessed incorrectly, so that's a 35 unless I made stupid errors, of course.
Reading: NO clue. No "guesses," but I went more based off of memory from reading the passage than I would have liked, i.e. I couldn't thoroughly check my answers by referring back to the passage. I would guess a 30-32
Science: HOLY HELL!!!!!!! NO idea, praying for a 30, I'd be lucky with a 28, probably got a 12. hahaha
Writing: I did VERY, VERY well (I think anyway, not to brag) because I was prepared for a question like that. For the sake of substance, I would say an 11 or 12. I used up every line provided, wrote in an eloquent manner, and proved my point very thoroughly. LMAO! However, I doubt that I got more than a 6 or 7 because my writing was illegible. My hand was throbbing by that point, and I couldn't even read my own writing towards the end. :(</p>
<p>There was one question that tricked me....</p>
<p>It was about the women in WWII; it went something like the architect Georgia and the photographer Silvia</p>
<p>were there suppose to be any commas?</p>
<p>YEAH! I didn't put in any commas, I hope that's right...</p>
<p>yeah i put no commas too LOL</p>
<p>In a situation like that, not talking specifically about the test, the commas are NOT necessary. ;) Positivo about that uno. </p>
<p>What did ya'll get for the who/whom one on the English section? I was a little iffy on that one because I couldn't identify the subject that the "who/whom" was referring to as clearly as I would have liked too....</p>
<p>we definately need to make a threat for strategies cause preparation books dont have them right</p>
<p>haha I put the architect, Georgia, and the photographer, Silvia</p>
<p>i think most likely wrong because it's me</p>
<p>SillBill, im not sure which one you are talking about. But if its the one im thinking, i put who.</p>
<p>Hah stupid two scientist one took me at least 10 minutes. I read the question then went to look at the equations and then kept forgetting what I was looking for. Oh and I pull no commas for the Georgia question- made sense at the time. Re-take anyone?</p>
<p>Wasn't there a who/whom question asking about ducks?</p>
<p>I dont remember, but i know if there was, i wouldnt have put either, cuz ducks are not people lol... maybe i put "it" or "they" or something.</p>
<p>.....scccccccieeeeeeeencccccce.... <em>shrivels up and dies</em></p>
<p>I honestly do not believe that we were given enough time for that section. I went FAST and I barely had time to skim each experiment. And the last two... were not cool at all, but they probably would have been better if I had more than two minutes to do them.</p>
<p>English didn't seem too bad, math was ehh... reading seemed ok, writing was ok.</p>
<p>Yeah, so the duck one should have been "that can be found", not "whom are found"? ...crap
Riiight, I suppose ducks don't qualify as people. In conclusion, I am stupid.... I knew that was wrong... I just thought whom sounded better, ugh</p>
<p>In other news, I found the science section to be really easy! It's the first time I finished in the time period and the first time I decided to skip around rather than go in order<this REALLY helps. I saved the fighting scientists passage for last.</p>
<p>And the essay topic was awesome. I wrote so much and I think I clearly conveyed my point.</p>