<p>It just does that (22 at first) I think, It’ll probably change once enrollment actually starts. I’m pretty sure it restricts you no matter the amount of AP credit you have (I mean, AP credit honestly isn’t that special. Most people have all 6 courses allowed plus some. On top of this, they generally are not the same as the equivalent college course, so saying that some freshmen are allowed to take on more credits than others b/c of it doesn’t seem right). I have friends who are dual degree and are CS/music majors, one is not at Tech and he was Chem and Math, another who may do it is physics and chem. It’s doable as long as you continually take a challenging load. Your experience this year should be a litmus test of sorts in this arena. </p>
<p>About lab: Soria’s lab will sometimes meet twice a week, but not often. He’ll often cancel lab for a day (or the whole week). Normally whether you show up depends on your level of progress on your task/project. The labs aren’t “cookbook” (read the manual and do what it says) like the other lab sections. Often you need to do some of your own research and use intuition along with your peers’ and Soria’s guidance to get tasks done. Basically, the lab is more inquiry based. He doesn’t force it to last 2.5-3hrs. It’s simply: Get your job done, record your results and maybe write a lab report if asked to do so. Given this, often showing up for the 2nd day of lab is unnecessary further into the course. Often it will be used to perform mini-tasks related to your nearly finished projects (like running an IR or NMR, things related to confirmation of results) in which case Soria will reserve time slots throughout whichever day (say Thursday session) for individuals or groups to come in . From what I remember, there were only about 3 weeks where I used both meetings specifically to do intensive lab work (as opposed to one for that and the other finishing touches or not at all). </p>
<p>If it your limit is 22hrs (I doubt this, but cross your fingers), Python is fine I guess. Just hope it doesn’t end up as rigorous as the 2 credit CS course that my friend took the past spring. Having that w/orgo, bio, and multivariate will make for a “fun” first semester.<br>
More advice: Get ready to work hard. Biology and multivariate will have a legit workload or more “pressing” study load attached. Bio lecture (make sure you choose a good lecturer or else, this course can be an energy zapper) has quizzes and stuff, and the lab eventually becomes quite tedious to say the least. And some multivariate profs. give lots of homework. Soria’s class is about figuring out how to study effectively and anticipating curve balls and not being caught off-guard (again, don’t let exam 1 and 2 fool you!). Best that you review notes (uses socratic heavily and puts students on spot. He knows all the names perhaps by day 1 or 2 of class) everyday for it and don’t rely heavily upon the book. Also, if he asks you a question or elicits a response about something being covered, never say “I don’t know” or cop even the slightest attitude (just make up something that seems somewhat reasonable based upon what you learned. It’s okay if it’s wrong. He just wants you to think. He expects discussion, debate, and engagement). He’ll use it as justification to make the exams harder. Basically, his class is the only where you need be prepared when you show up (this will also optimize the amount of bonus points you can earn). The others primarily require you to take in info. in lecture and prepare for any assessments (with exception of case-based sections of biology which are superior to the others. I recommend one if available). Your level of engagement in Soria’s class normally correlates well w/performance on exam 3-4 (where you must do as in class and think about a completely foreign concept). </p>
<p>More heads up on Soria’s course (I always feel the need to do heavy coverage on it b/c it is quite challenging and I feel I should simultaneously warn and comfort those going into. It may be your hardest course) Soria’s course does not “flow” in a linear fashion. You do not cover topics related to each other on some day by day basis. He jumps around and teaches what he wants to (this means you need to be very independent. It’s often left up to you to connect perhaps seemingly loosely connected dots. You’ll be left to think and inquire about such things. He will not “connect the dots” for you). He tends to present relevant material by working and assessing a difficult problem (perhaps on a large molecule) and covering every aspect of organic chem. w/in the scope of the course w/in that single problem (basically instead of 1-2 topics per session, it’s several and throughout the semester, these several will be presented in varying contexts of varying difficulty. After say, 3 contexts, you should have masted the topics and should be able to “connect the dots” I mentioned. This is important for the harder exams. Seeing how otherwise loosely connected issues function together in complex systems and molecules)Best that you take thorough notes b/c anything he discussed or presented is fair game (on an exam, a concept may be applied in a completely new way). Do not freak out when you read the night before to prep. and he then goes on to present something completely different or far more advanced than what you read (basically, your reading will get you started, but creativity and thinking on your feet is key to successful participation) or even covered the day before. The only thing that will reflect readings and notes pretty precisely are quizzes (these are very simple). I just say all of this, because it takes some students time to get used to his style as they are used to presentation of material in a linear fashion. Not only that, but they are certainly not used to the level of engagement required nor the idea that creativity could be applied and tested vigorously in a science course (especially, a frosh or 2nd year course). His style is meant to create an intellectual community in which all students are “on their toes” and are thinking deeply (and communicating those thoughts. sometimes you’ll be asked to come to the board, which is rare in college lecture halls, especially science) about complex topics (often material he presents will far exceed the standard organic chem. course, even in comparison to other elite institutions). You may not like it at first, but trust me, it pays. You’ll probably end up liking it a lot and you’ll be shocked at what you and your peers (class is very collaborative b/c there isn’t a curve, just bonus points, which is basically a “self-imposed” curve) can do as a freshmen. As a future engineer, this is another good class for you, but I have to let you know it has its challenges. Your peers in the class will generally follow you to higher level maths and the like and make a great support group as they are by and large some of the strongest at Emory.</p>
<p>Anyway, I will try to e-mail him on Monday regarding the concern.</p>