<p>does anyone remember the answer choices? for the remuneration one</p>
<p>answer choices for remuneration? or the sentence?</p>
<p>Remuneration I remember also had the answers “notification” and “solicitation” which were both clearly wrong. It was about workers not getting paid enough..</p>
<p>i remember crossing out ebullient for the question whose answer was nuanced… i chose phlegmatic, foolishly</p>
<p>i do no remember an ebullient salutory question at all…</p>
<p>Murdered =/</p>
<p>Ok here it is
- Longevity
- Characterize .. mountainous
- Ameliorate .. exacerbate
- Remuneration
- Abstemious
- Malicious
- Controversial .. hypothesis
- Suspended .. suffered
- Obstinate
10 Olfactory
11 Obstreperous
12 Iconoclast .. skewered
13 Nuance
14 Deceit .. willing
15 underestimated .. complexity
16 undaunted by
17 parity
18 synthesize .. interweaving
19 Vitriolic .. savor</p>
<p>Any objections??</p>
<p>19/19</p>
<p>I agree.</p>
<p>Seems right to me :)</p>
<p>i agree.</p>
<p>sadly 15/19, but oh well.</p>
<p>i guess i missed about 10 total…but I was aiming for a 660, so I still have a very good shot!!!</p>
<p>i think underestimated…complexity is wrong.</p>
<p>I put exagerated…intricacy.</p>
<p>b/c it says that the scientists took the fact that protein SIMPLY coiled for granted…meaning they didn’t think it could be that simple, so they exagerated it’s intricacy.</p>
<p>wow nice i got all of them…good job with the list</p>
<p>No, underestimated/complexity is definitely right. Intricacy means it’s complicated, if they exaggerated the intricacy they would have overcomplicated it, when in fact they were oversymplifying it.</p>
<p>18/19
Obstreperous? I’ve never heard that word before. Back to the vocab list, I suppose.</p>
<p>^ they were overcomplicating it…because they took the simpleness of it for granted.</p>
<p>i’m pretty sure on this one.</p>
<p>17 parity</p>
<p>what was the sentence for this???</p>
<p>Parity sentence: “Blah always treated his kids with ____, sharing things equally between them”</p>
<p>Something like that.</p>
<p>'^ they were overcomplicating it…because they took the simpleness of it for granted.</p>
<p>i’m pretty sure on this one.'</p>
<p>^They underestimated the complexity. They didn’t realize how complicated it was; they thought that it simply folded and that was the end of it.
I’m sure on this too.</p>
<p>I had no idea what parity meant, but it sounded right. 
Looks like I got 19/19. Hooray! And I’m pretty sure it is underestimated is right.</p>
<p>The father treated both sons with _____, giving unfair leniency towards neither…not exactly but basic idea…</p>