<p>For the mystical poetry guy English section, did anbody put "had wrote" Come to think of it, I should have left NO CHANGE : "had written" it was somewhere near the end of the section</p>
<p>For the Chinese brine reading section, who else put something about the region having a prosperous brine harvesting operation (not starting a new one)</p>
<p>Oh yeah, and what is the curve on the math section like. I think worse case scenario is like I missed 15-20 questions, not even kidding</p>
<p>i hope i can improve on my 33 despite my not studying at all. </p>
<p>i think i got around 33 in english, 35/36 reading, uggghhh probably 35 in math becuase of that stupid coordinate question, and i missed 2 or 1 on science (i'm convinced that arteries show the greatest blood pressure range though). </p>
<p>it would be great if someone could tell me how i would score if i missed (projected, obviously) 2-3 in english, 1 in writing, 2 in math, and 2 in science. i heard the Real ACT book has pretty accurate scaling chart things, but i dont have that.</p>
<p>and it's lived in what is now, not where is now</p>
<p>Delta Blues were considered influential ...and important? I forget the other adjective</p>
<p>I said B for the duck's feet one....I think it had to do with the feet being colder than the body? anyone put that down?</p>
<p>I said the brine made the Chinese prosperous...I verified in the passage.</p>
<p>I'm still not sure if the Shakespeare explanation was relevant (I said it was irrelevant) and the details about the float test for dough (I said it was needed). Anyone?</p>
<p>I put paper between and metal on the outside for the diagram in the science section</p>
<p>I believe both air resistance and buoyancy had up arrows...</p>
<p>None of the elements escaped Jupiter because it's V/6 was 9.9 or so and all the elements at 500 degrees didn't exceed 4. So SCOH was the answer I think...whatever all of them was.</p>
<p>the float test for that random tamale passage was really tricky imo, but i did say it was nescesary because the next sentence mentions sinking, and i felt that the an antecedent would have to appear in the preceding sentence because it seemed a bit vague, although clearly unambiguous</p>
<p>well see...I thought that Shakespeare is a bit more like "common knowledge" and that going into an explanation of his works would detract from the point of the essay...anyone make the same conclusion?</p>
<p>Shakespeare - Definitely not necessary. Why would he even use Shakespeare as a comparison if he then had to explain who Shakespeare is?! Plus, sounded to biographical and cold.</p>
<p>Tamale Test - Definitely necessary. The next sentence started with "If it sinks..." It what? Or something very similar.</p>
<p>i thought so too but i imagined reading the passage to someone who really doesn't know who shakespeare is, and then they would need that line to understand. ugh, i hate these opinion based questions....either one could be argued</p>
<p>Well, I guess they assume that anyone who can read knows who Shakespeare is... and even if not, the sentence just doesn't fit the "tone" of the essay... and takes it way off-topic</p>
<p>RememberMe1990 is smart! lol. I think it's absolutely ridiculous that some would consider the Shakespeare info relevant). As RememberMe pointed out, it's essentially common knowledge.</p>