<p>Orly? It’s stressing out other people. You might not know it, but the posters who aren’t showing up on this thread are probably pulling out hair as you all speak about curves.</p>
<p>^ Yes, that’s why this thread garnered 113 posts, right? Because people are so anxious when talking about curves?
<a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/act-preparation/996452-september-2010-act-curve-prediction.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/act-preparation/996452-september-2010-act-curve-prediction.html</a></p>
<p>^ Yup…because it was created for posters that WANT to.</p>
<p>I’m one of those “other people stressing out”</p>
<p>I’m nervous and worried about tomorrow, and I haven’t been posting regularly in this thread, but I enjoy watching you guys figure out the curve. I have no idea if I put prideful vs. something else, and no idea how many I would have missed. I just enjoy a puzzle, and watching everyone guess and figure it out. It’s nice knowing I’m not the only one wondering what tomorrow will bring.</p>
<p>GO STRONG CC-ers!</p>
<p>^^ Exactly, just like this thread was created for people to discuss anything related to the September ACT as said in the first post. Everyone knows we’re only speculating at the curves, so chill out.</p>
<p>^ Thanks for the support. JDE seems utterly unqualified in speaking for the masses.</p>
<p>^ You’re the one getting heated. </p>
<p>you mad brah?</p>
<p>^ Nope, I’m not the one secretly anguishing over the curve so much that I try to speak for everyone to stop people from talking about the curve. :)</p>
<p>You scared brah?</p>
<p>^ Nope. I don’t predict the curve because I don’t work for the ACT. Apparently you do, so I guess we should all praise you. Judging from your username, I wouldn’t be surprised if you DID work for the ACT.</p>
<p>You embarrassed, brah?</p>
<p>^ wth are you talking about? That’s mean of you to say.</p>
<p>LOL. Apparently predicting the curve means I work for ACT. So that must mean hundreds of people on these boards work for the ACT while also taking the ACT. Fail logic is fail. Oh, and you’re calling me sad based on what I spent a couple of seconds choosing as my username? All I see that’s sad here is how you’re resorting to personal attacks at me just because you lost a debate.</p>
<p>You have low self-esteem brah?</p>
<p>And seriously, stop spamming my thread already.</p>
<p>Your thread? Now you own CC? Do you pay for the domain name too?</p>
<p>^^ Lol, way to respond to one insignificant part of my post and ignore the rest. Now that’s what I call pathetic.</p>
<p>Perhaps this conversation should be moved elsewhere…</p>
<p>Guys, can you both shut the he.ll up and just talk about the ACT. Gosh, you’re even more annoying when you’re not talking about it.</p>
<p>^ Grow up… 1st grade comeback is 1st grade comeback.</p>
<p>^ And that’s what I kindly asked you to do about five posts ago. Now that you lost the “argument” you suddenly agree with me? Like I said before, please ■■■■ and stop spamming the thread.</p>
<p>I day!!!</p>
<p>All I’m saying is that it’s futile to predict the curves. You’re only stressing out others by saying -1 on science is a 34.</p>
<p>^ Are we seriously going back to the “stressing people out” thing? Like one person has already said, he/she enjoys talking about the curves. You have yet to find even one person who doesn’t, apart from yourself. I’m tired of going in circles, so I’m out. And where did I say -1 in Science was a 34? As you can clearly read (or maybe can’t), I said there “doesn’t seem to be a 34 for Science”. </p>
<p>Anyway, we’re almost at the homestretch everybody! :)</p>
<p>^ Stop arguing. I ended it and you continue. -.-</p>
<p>1 day and 35 min!</p>