Sexy back

<p>beats are money...you have to know what it feels like when you've perfectly beatmatched two seperate albums to really understand</p>

<p><a href="http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/details_pop.aspx?iid=52843523&cdi=0%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/details_pop.aspx?iid=52843523&cdi=0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p><a href="http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/details_pop.aspx?iid=51201304&cdi=0%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/details_pop.aspx?iid=51201304&cdi=0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>I'm not sure exactly what the songwriter meant by 'back', but when I think of a sexy back (aka what I want my back to look like), I think of one of the two above photos. I mean, take a look at the MUSCLE!</p>

<p>^^um.....ok</p>

<p>i think he's saying he's bring sexy back, not talking about A sexy back. of course, that begs the question, when was sexy gone?</p>

<p>REALLY GUYS COME ON THIS SONG ROCKS!!!!! IT's soooo catchyyy.</p>

<p>i'll admit its been stuck in my head lately. its catchy but its pointless. and it just seems like he put no effort into it.</p>

<p>pretty catchy and original song. at least justin timberlake takes the time to reinvent himself and at least show some variety in his music, not something u can say about most pop performers</p>

<p>what so reinventive? his voice is computerized, which he and others have done before, and the song has a timbaland beat to it...which again, he and many artsits have done before. it just sounds like a crappy pop song, which again again, he and many others have done before.</p>

<p>cristina aguilera has reivented herself more than Justing timberlake has...</p>

<p>Computerized? Almost all artists have their sounds cleaned up by production. In fact, a lot of rock groups don't even record their instruments in the same room, they seperate and then it's all put together during the production process. How is that anymore natural then Justin Timberlake's voice being cleaned up? Listen to Nirvana's Nevermind on CD and then compare it to live versions, almost completely different songs.</p>

<p>I saw JT live back in 2003 (didn't pay for the ticket, I was doing front gate security) and his voice wasn't that bad. The people there felt the need to be ungrateful douches and throw bottles at him during his performance, during a benefit concert no less, but he took it amazingly well.</p>

<p>"I saw JT live back in 2003 (didn't pay for the ticket, I was doing front gate security) and his voice wasn't that bad. The people there felt the need to be ungrateful douches and throw bottles at him during his performance, during a benefit concert no less, but he took it amazingly well."</p>

<p>In Toronto, right? Haha, I was there too. I felt kind of bad for him with the bottles and all... it just wasn't his crowd.</p>

<p>only in america.</p>

<p>I feel your pain</p>

<p>Oh. I thought this thread was going to be about sexy backs. :(</p>

<p>
[quote]
Computerized? Almost all artists have their sounds cleaned up by production. In fact, a lot of rock groups don't even record their instruments in the same room, they seperate and then it's all put together during the production process. How is that anymore natural then Justin Timberlake's voice being cleaned up? Listen to Nirvana's Nevermind on CD and then compare it to live versions, almost completely different songs.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>um...thank you captain obvious. </p>

<p>i meant his voice literally sound unnatural. have you really heard the song? his voice is synthesized or something. like voices from weird techno songs, or like in kc & jojo's "crazy", although in "crazy" its a little less noticeable. if you have the volume above 1, you'll hear what i'm talking about.</p>

<p>yeah its more computerized than normal. it doesnt sound like his voice AT ALL.</p>

<p>Whatever. stop taking the song too seriously. It's meant to be fun and catchy, and it is. Get over it.</p>

<p>you have got to be the worst nirvana fan ever</p>

<p>atleast, the biggest disgrace to the rest of us</p>

<p>umm its just the opposite, no one takes the song seriously. its crap. catchy, but crap.

[quote]
stop taking the song too seriously. It's meant to be fun and catchy, and it is. Get over it.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Oh, and i don't take orders.</p>

<p>you, my friend, are a rock fan</p>

<p>A REAL ONE</p>

<p>yes i am, although dont get the wrong idea im not much of a green day fan anymore ( made the user name over a year ago) so dont base that assessment on that. i dont like classic rock much, maybe because my parents do and i need to rebel. lol.</p>

<p>...its all the same, atleast you're not falling for this brittany spears crap</p>