<p>I don't know why I've been avoiding this subject, but I guess I'll chime in now.</p>
<p>It would be very difficult to regulate cheating in standardized test situations without extreme measures being taken. Most proctors don't care enough to check which sections students are working in, nor do they know the difference between a TI-83 and a TI-89. Sucks, but it's the truth. A solution to this would be having each section collected after they are completed and desks with walls on 3 sides, but that would be ridiculous and a huge, complex inconvenience. Unfortunately, things like this are left up to the integrity of the students. Whether or not they make the right decisions doesn't matter to anyone but themselves.</p>
<p>In a high school setting, cheating is even worse, and also surprisingly widely accepted by teachers. I don't know how teachers can grade papers and not see trends, or even if they do, just overlook them without any suspicion or consequences. Perhaps its laziness, perhaps its ignorance, who knows? I can excuse cheating on homework, but that's where the definition of cheating comes in. Is working in large groups or using Sparknotes cheating? To me, no. Is blatantly copying someone else's work on a BS assignment cheating. Yes, but for some reason I see that as excusable too if the person takes the time to actually read over the assignment and learn the material. </p>
<p>What really irks me is cheating on tests and projects, where teachers don't do their part to ensure fairness to other students. If someone copies a wikipedia entry for a report and gets a 100% while I properly do research, citing sources and such and get a 100%, that's aggravating. Also, on tests, where answers are text-messaged across the room or someone passes around a set of copied answers. I KNOW that teachers know about this. Some interfere, some don't. Also, I don't see why innocent students should be put in the position of "snitching" on their classmates when a teacher is fully aware of the situation and will do nothing about it. I've had a few smart teachers that hand out different versions of tests and actually enforce their rules about cheating, but they are hard to come by. What's actually pretty funny about this situation is that most of the kids that cheat still end up failing or doing poorly anyway. Nonetheless, the kids that do cheat and are successful are more bothersome because they have a false sense of accomplishment and often receive recognition for it. Honestly, ranks don't matter at all, but I understand how dedicated, honest students feel when they are surpassed by their cheating peers. </p>
<p>That was pretty-long winded, but pretty much there's not much that can be done about cheating without serious effort from the people in charge. Students bringing it to their attention may help, but again, it depends on what type of school/teacher/environment you're dealing with. At my school the message is "graduate by any means necessary" while at other schools it may be "get into the ivies by any means necessary", so I could imagine two huge different perspectives on and methods of cheating. ::sigh:: oh well.</p>