<p>I am a transfer student and have been accepted to several UC's, but I have narrowed my decision down to UCLA and UC Davis. I am currently majoring in Anthropology. As of now, I like UC Davis more than UCLA, however, I would like to know some statistics on if it is really better from a career stand-point to go to UCLA. I am not sure what I want to do with my degree yet, which is probably part of the problem. The following is a list of Pro's & Con's for each school (please tell me what you think after reading them): Pro's for UCLA: Prestigious, Offered me a $15,000 scholarship for my first year, Supposed to have great job connections after graduation, Always something going on, I would make my family proud. Con's for UCLA: It is in the center of LA (I have lived in the OC my entire life & was hoping to get out of SoCal), everyone that I have met who goes there is somewhat stuck up (I'm sure there are some nice people there, but that's the vibe I've gotten so far), my boyfriend is going to UC Davis, I didn't feel as good there as I did when I went to Davis, I have heard classes are super competitive (even though I consider myself to be a somewhat intelligent individual and think it's good to be academic, I prefer to have a social life mixed in the picture so I don't get overstressed from my studies). Pro's for UC Davis: It's a beautiful city; One of the few college towns left in the US; Everyone rides bicycles (I love to ride my bike); Good academics and less competitive than UCLA; Friendly environment and people; Picnic and Whole Earth Festival Days; Cheaper housing; My boyfriend goes there; Close to San Fransisco & Sacramento. Con's for UC Davis: Only giving me a $9,000 scholarship; My Boyfriend could be a potential distraction; Not as prestigious or reputable as UCLA; I don't know if I would be making less money with a degree from here than UCLA; My parents would be disappointed.</p>
<p>Thank you for taking the time to read this and answer my question. It is truly appreciated. :)</p>