<p>hmm…I’m from LA, and I’d have to agree that I view UCLA as just a bit more prestigious than SC. I guess its because I have had A TON of friends who went SC, and they all say it was a pretty easy school to get through. Also UCLA seems to be a lot more interactive within its city context and contribute a lot more into research, art and other things.</p>
<p>Either way, they’re both awesome schools in their own unique right. Ultimately it just depends what the person wants from their education and how far they’re willing to dig their debts. </p>
<p>PS…Grey…I’m from your area too…NELA… lol</p>
<p>One of the managers at work went to UCLA and constantly bashes USC during football season.</p>
<p>We like to remind him that he went to grad school at SC.</p>
<p>:)</p>
<p>Does sc really have hotter girls?</p>
<p>lol no, anywhere you go in socal is bound to have some of the most beautiful girls in the world (if you like that style). If anything I’d say UCLA has more beautiful girls, because obviously they have more students, so there will be more hott girls, while the ratio of hott to not stays the same. </p>
<p>IF thats what you’re aiming for though, try SDSU. 36,000 students and more than enough sorority sluts to go around!</p>