<p>I just got back my ACT results from the test I took through my school at the end of April (on the 23rd). Actually, my English had access to some parts of my score but not all of them. Basically, here's what she was able to find for me:</p>
<p>Composite: 32
English: 35
Writing: 10</p>
<p>Based on that and my previous practice, my math was most likely 35 or 36, my science was average (probably close to 31), and my reading was below my composite (probably about 27 or 28). I'm still waiting for the official results to come out, but that gave me a good idea. Also, my writing was the same as when I took it the last time (I got 10 both times I took it).</p>
<p>Here's my dilemma: I swore that if I could get a 33 or higher, I would try to apply to some VERY selective schools (like CalTech or MIT, I plan on going into the STEM area). I know that MIT super scores, and I'm not sure about CalTech. So based on this, should I retake the ACT in the fall and try to get higher sub scores, in hopes that my super scored composite is a 33 or above? Or is it not worth it to take the whole test again for the one point?</p>
<p>Also, would I need to take the test with writing, even though I haven't taken two tests that have writing scores on them? It would save some money and time to not have to take the writing and just focus on the English, Math, Reading, and Science (mainly reading, though...). Or would I need it to have the writing with it to count towards my super score? Thanks for the help!</p>