<p>I'm taking both macro and microecon on FLVS, which gives me the opportunity to choose to take them in whatever order I want. </p>
<p>I was thinking maybe Macroecon first, and Microecon second. Does the order even matter?</p>
<p>I'm not sure if it matters, but at my school macro comes first.</p>
<p>Yea, it seems like most schools do that.</p>
<p>Bump bump bump</p>
<p>From looking at pasts threads on this, it seems that Micro would actually be best to take first.</p>
<p>Macro is easier, but it doesn't really matter as neither one builds on the other or anything like that.</p>
<p>Micro. Macroeconomics builds upon the foundation of community created by Microeconomics. It will probably help you learn more terms. =]</p>
<p>They do build upon each other in the fact that if you know nothing about economies, take the basics first then apply them to countries.</p>
<p>i agree with asdfjkl1 !
Micro is a bit harder to some people, but it does give the basic information on economics.</p>