@pocrocodro : “In essence, the essay does still include ‘me’, but it includes my experiences…” This is where my greatest question rested - how well, how truthfully, how faithfully - did the submitted application reflect who you are? Sounds like you are saying it was true for the facts, but not necessarily your sentiments or expressions.
I was suggesting that you decide whether you could later accept an offer of admission which was spearheaded and crafted by * not you*. You sound so conflicted at this point (and rightfully so), wanting to know that you are doing the ethical thing by sitting with an agent of the university which is truly considering your application.
Make no mistake, you would be compromising the integrity of the application and more than likely its consideration altogether **if you were to leave the interviewer with the idea ** that the essays are not your own, or do not represent your voice. You would not be compromising your own integrity to do so, however.
In deciding whether to go forward and keep mum about remaining in consideration for a seat you have expressed no interest in having, a spot you have felt to be sought in your name but not by you, you must only answer for yourself whether you want the seat.
Will you be able to reconcile that the application reflects some of you as you would be known (the facts), and yet was constructed through a process that removed the parts of you which you would have liked to be known? The answer to that is, yes, you view the application as something written with undue assistance and guidance but still your something you can sign your name to, which makes it yours.
In that case, the interview is yours as well, if you can walk in unconflicted and maintain your composure.
I withdraw the presumption of fraud from from any action you take going forward. I would not leave you with that stuck to ideas of yourself, from a stranger you are likely to never meet in person. I know you were pressured, and you are now still operating under the strains of that pressure.