‘Smart pills’ are on rise, is taking them wise?

<p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13253938/?GT1=8211%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13253938/?GT1=8211&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>WASHINGTON - Studying with diligent friends is fine, says Heidi Lessing, a University of Delaware sophomore.</p>

<p>But after a couple of hours, it's time for a break, a little gossip: "I want to talk about somebody walking by in the library."</p>

<p>One of those friends, however, is working too hard for dish — way too hard.</p>

<p>Instead of joining in the gossip, "She says, 'Be quiet,' " Lessing says, astonishment still registering in her voice.</p>

<p>Her friend's attention is laserlike, totally focused on her texts, even after an evening of study. "We were so bored," Lessing says. But the friend was still "really into it. It's annoying."</p>

<p>The reason for the difference: Her pal is fueled with "smart pills" that increase her concentration, focus, wakefulness and short-term memory.</p>

<p>As university students all over the country emerge from final exam hell this month, the number of healthy people using bootleg pharmaceuticals of this sort seems to be soaring.</p>

<p>Such brand-name prescription drugs "were around in high school, but they really exploded in my third and fourth years" of college, says Katie Garrett, a 2005 University of Virginia graduate.</p>

<p>The bootleg use even in her high school years was erupting, according to a study published in February in an international biomedical and psychosocial journal, Drug and Alcohol Dependence. Mining 2002 data, it noted that even then, more than 7 million Americans used bootleg prescription stimulants, and 1.6 million of those users were of student age.</p>

<p>By the time students reach college nowadays, they're already apt to know about these drugs, obtained with or without a prescription.</p>

<p>"I'm a varsity athlete in crew," says Katharine Malone, a George Washington University junior. "So we're pretty careful about what we put in our bodies. So among my personal friends, I'd say the use is only like 50 or 60 percent."</p>

<p>‘Brain steroids’
Seen by some ambitious students as the winner's edge — the difference between a 3.8 average and a 4.0, maybe their ticket to Harvard Law — these "brain steroids" can be purchased on many campuses for as little as $3 to $5 per pill, though they are often obtained free from friends with legitimate prescriptions, students report.</p>

<p>These drugs represent only the first primitive, halting generation of cognitive enhancers. Memory drugs will soon make it to market if human clinical trials continue successfully.</p>

<p>There are lots of the first-generation drugs around. Total sales have increased by more than 300 percent in only four years, topping $3.6 billion last year, according to IMS Health, a pharmaceutical information company.</p>

<p>They include Adderall, which was originally aimed at people with attention-deficit disorder, and Provigil, which was aimed at narcoleptics, who fall asleep uncontrollably. In the healthy, this class of drugs variously aids concentration, alertness, focus, short-term memory and wakefulness — useful qualities in students working on complex term papers and pulling all-nighters before exams. Adderall sales are up 3,135.6 percent over the same period. Provigil is up 359.7 percent.</p>

<p>In May, the Partnership for a Drug-Free America issued its annual attitude-tracking study on drug use. It is a survey of more than 7,300 seventh- through 12th-graders, designed to be representative of the larger U.S. population, according to Thomas A. Hedrick Jr., a founding director of the organization. It reported that among kids of middle school and high school age, 2.25 million are using stimulants such as Ritalin without a prescription.</p>

<p>That's about one in 10 of the 22 million students in those grades, as calculated by the U.S. Department of Education. Half the time, the study reported, the students were using these drugs not so much to get high as "to help me with my problems" or "to help me with specific tasks." That motivation was growing rapidly, Hedrick says.</p>

<p>Focused overachievement
Why should we be surprised? This generation is the one we have pushed to get into the best high schools and colleges, to have the best grades and résumés. Computer nerds are culture heroes, SAT scores are measures of our worth and the Ivy League is Valhalla. Hermione Granger in "Harry Potter" is a heroine despite being such a goody two-shoes that she doubles up her course load with a spell that allows her to be in two places at once. This is the kind of focused overachievement that is addressed by smart pills.</p>

<p>Smart-pill use has not been the focus of much data collection. This comes as no surprise to researchers such as Richard Restak, a Washington neurologist and president of the American Neuropsychiatric Association, who has written extensively about smart drugs in his 2003 book, "The New Brain: How the Modern Age Is Rewiring Your Mind," as well as his forthcoming "The Naked Brain: How the Neurosociety Is Changing How We Live, Work and Love."</p>

<p>Contributing to this dearth, he points out, is that these drugs are not famous for being abused recreationally and they are not being used by people with a disease.</p>

<p>This is not "the type of data collected by the FDA," he says. Law-enforcement activity has been sparse. "Who is the complainant?"</p>

<p>Who is using?
Compared with the kind of drug users who get police attention, "This is an entirely different population of people — from the unmotivated to the super-motivated," Restak says. These "drug users may be at the top of the class, instead of the ones hanging around the corners."</p>

<p>Smart-pill use generally doesn't show up in campus health center reports, he says, because "This is not the kind of stuff that you would overdose on" easily. Amphetamines are associated with addiction and bodily damage, but in use by ambitious students, "if you go a little over you get wired up but it wears off in a couple of hours. And Provigil has a pretty good safety record."</p>

<p>Finally, smart-pill use is a relatively recent development that has not yet achieved widespread attention, much less study, although Restak expects that to change.</p>

<p>"We're going to see it not only in schools, but in businesses, especially where mental endurance matters." Restak can easily imagine a boss saying, " 'You've been here 14 hours; could you do another six?' It's a very competitive world out there, and this gives people an edge."</p>

<p>Generation gap
When you start asking questions about smart pills, the answers you get divide sharply into two groups.</p>

<p>When you ask the grown-ups — deans, crisis counselors, health counselors— they tell you they don't know too much about the subject, but they don't think it is much of a problem at their institutions.</p>

<p>"I'm not sure of the size and scope," says Jonathan Kandell, a psychologist and assistant director at the University of Maryland Counseling Center. "I have heard about it. But I don't get a sense it's a major thing that they come to the center about."</p>

<p>When you ask the students, they ask why you weren't on this story three years ago. Even if some of these drugs are amphetamines, it's medicine parents give to 8-year-olds, they say. It's brand-name stuff, in precise dosages. How bad can it be?</p>

<p>Continuation: next post</p>

<p>Warning: Side effects
In the name of altering mood, energy and thinking patterns, we have been marinating our brains in chemicals for a very long time.</p>

<p>Caffeine is as old as coffee in Arabia, tea in China, and chocolate in the New World. Alcohol, coca leaves, tobacco and peyote go way back.</p>

<p>What's new is the range, scope, quantity and quality of substances, old and new, aimed at boosting our brains — as well as the increase in what's in the pipeline.</p>

<p>The memory compounds being raced to market by four U.S. companies are initially aimed at the severely impaired, such as early-stage Alzheimer's patients. But researchers expect the market for memory drugs to rapidly extend into the aging population we think of as normal, such as the more than 70 million baby boomers who are tired of forgetting what they meant to buy at the shopping mall and then realizing they've forgotten where they parked their cars, too. Or students who think such drugs could gain them hundreds of points on their SATs.</p>

<p>But there are side effects with every drug. Strattera — the ADHD medicine that is not a stimulant and may be taken for weeks before it shows an effect — comes with a warning that it can result in fatal liver failure. The FDA warns it also may increase thoughts of suicide in young people. For a while last year, Canada pulled a form of Adderall from its markets as a result of sudden unexplained deaths in children with cardiac abnormalities. Provigil can decrease the effectiveness of birth control. All of these drugs come with a raft of side-effect warnings.</p>

<p>Nonetheless, pharmaceutical companies are racing to bring to market new drugs aimed at fundamentally altering our attitudes toward having a healthy brain.</p>

<p>'It ain't worth it'
Is this what smart has come to in the early 21st century? Is Ken Jennings, the "Jeopardy" phenom, our model of smart? Do SATs and grade-point averages measure all of what it means to be intelligent?</p>

<p>If so, these drugs have a potent future. But definitions of intelligence may change — already, some colleges have stopped requiring SAT scores from applicants.</p>

<p>Eric R. Kandel is shocked by the idea that powerful elixirs like the ones he is developing might rapidly trickle down to ambitious college kids. He shared the 2000 Nobel Prize in medicine for his research on the physiological basis of memory storage in neurons. He also founded Memory Pharmaceuticals.</p>

<p>"That's awful! Why should they be taking drugs? They should just study! I think this is absurd. What's so terrible about having a 3.9? The idea that character and functioning and intelligence is to be judged by a small difference on an exam — that's absurd. This is just like Barry Bonds and steroids. Exactly what you want to discourage. These kids are very sensitive. Their brains are still developing. Who knows what might happen. I went to Harvard. I like Harvard. It ain't worth it."</p>

<p>The mind amplifiers he's working on, he insists, could have major effects on lots of needy people — those with mental retardation or Down syndrome, or those with memory loss from depression or Alzheimer's or cancer chemotherapy or schizophrenia. "There are lots of populations out there that really, really need help," he says.
© 2006 The Washington Post Company</p>

<p>It doesn't sound like there are bad side effects to taking pills like these. Aside from the ones that don't cause liver malfunction these pills sound like they get the job done when you need it. Of course I'm no doctor and I believe that all kind of chemicals you put into your body have some sort of side effect whether short term or long term. So anyone have any idea what could come out of using this? Are they legit to use just to get that boost of concentration? Has anyone used them before? Anything you can say about this would help. I've heard of them before but never really thought much of it since I always got good grades but college sounds like it's going to be a lot different with all the competition if you can use something else that doesn't have bad side effects to give you that extra boost why not? And no this isn't like taking steroids.</p>

<p>I have taken them when i needed them (for example: I had SATs the morning after prom night) and they worked perfectly and I have never had a single side effect...</p>

<p>side effects or not, there are ethical matters that should be considered. I would stay away from them unless you have a legitimate problem and a prescription.</p>

<p>whats unethical about it?</p>

<p>as long as i'm not hurting myself, or anyone else to succeed, i don't see what the problem would be in taking these pills. you go to school to succeed, these pills seem to help you do that without hurting anyone else, and they're just as readily available to those who look for them so I don't see what the ethical issue is behind it.</p>

<p>Pulling all-nighters for the sake of studying for exams due the next day or completing a term-paper due in the morning? These students do not sound like overachievers, but they sound rather like procrastinators who now have a good excuse to prolong their bad habits.</p>

<p>There have been perfect GPAs at HLS, and none of them were earned by students who used such drugs. </p>

<p>Time management sounds like a better plan. No pun intended.</p>

<p>What about for those that just want to get higher grades in general and use it to focus more on all assignments not just to do last minute studying?</p>

<p>"There have been perfect GPAs at HLS, and none of them were earned by students who used such drugs. "</p>

<p>how do you know this?</p>

<p>I know plenty of people who take them and have perfect GPAs in high school. I see absolutely nothing wrong with them and I personally think they should be available. If caffeine pills (which are horrible for you) are than why not adderall? There is nothing unethical about it. It doesn't make you smarter it just helps you to focus. Besides I don't believe that the majority of the people who are prescribed them actually need them.</p>

<p>I personally think its ridicoulous... I mean, if you look back for thousands of years, no one needed drugs to be smart... Aristotle, Newton, Galileo, Einstien... none of them needed any drugs and they turned out more than fine. It's like I say about steriods... Jack Lalane never used them, so in the same sense for these... Einstien never used them.</p>

<p>I've never used anything like that. I've also never pulled a single all-nighter. Time management is a wonderful thing.</p>

<p>The easiest parallel is obviously with steroids. They are easily available for professional baseball players throughout the country. Anyone who wants them can get them. They just give you "an edge"... they don't "hurt" anybody else. Does this mean steroids are ethical? I would have to say no. </p>

<p>Of course, some would say (me included) that academics is more of an individual contest and you will be cheating no one other than yourself. So, in many ways, it is a choice of personal ethics.</p>

<p>Oh course people on this board think it's alright to use these drug! Most people here are overachievers who are willing to live on 2 hours a sleep if it will get them into Harvard. So I don't see why people are so surprised about it.</p>

<p>Yeah, no problem, until someone who didn't use them sues to get the title of valedictorian back from the other person who did. Not to mention the issue of bootleg pharmaceuticals in the first place...</p>

<p>
[quote]
how do you know this?

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Possibly because those drugs were not available when they earned that perfect GPA... (Charlie Nesson comes to mind).</p>

<p>


I'm surprised to get this viewpoint from someone on CC. Barry Bonds didn't take steroids to make his team better, he took them (or so it says in Game of Shadows) to boost his own power numbers. And the competition to make Yale Law, to make a top medical school, to get a job at a top company, to get a prestigious grant. Who are you hurting? The person whose morals prevented them from taking these drugs and because of you taking them (the general you not anyone on this board in specific) don't get the grant or job or spot at a top school that they deserve.</p>

<p>I don't understand how this is a moral issue. How are you cheating yourself? It does not make you smarter it just gives you the tools to study and be more efficient. No pill is going to raise your IQ. Some people just use them for when they study or take tests so that they don't end up staring out the window the entire time. The pill never gives you the right answer. Nothing unethical about that.</p>

<p>
[quote]
Some people just use them for when they study or take tests so that they don't end up staring out the window the entire time

[/quote]
</p>

<p>That's true. Some people are just ****ing stupid. And be "stupid," I mean some people actually don't have a legitimate mental problem but are only lazy and undisciplined.</p>

<p>Actually, most people I know who take Adderall are quite book-smart, but are horribly insecure and so merely think they "need" prescription drugs to succeed. I dislike them more than people who are just lazy.</p>

<p>I personally think it IS an ethical problem. Unless a doctor has prescribed it for you, you shouldn't be taking Adderall. Is that so hard to understand? Or are you just truly ****ing stupid?</p>

<p>of course the pill won't make you smarter, but what about helping your short-term memory? Sounds like bs to me. It's unquestionably a performance enhancer; taking it would help you do better on a test, and if the teacher grades on a curve you could be hurting other students.</p>

<p>
[quote]
I know plenty of people who take them and have perfect GPAs in high school.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>And you don't find anything wrong with that? These are college-bound students trying to keep their gpa high, hurting other college-bound students in the admissions process. If they couldn't get a 4.0 without the pills, and had no legitimate reason to take the pills, they essentially cheated their way to the top.</p>