<p>[What they just paid their most recent alcohol consultant alone is many times the cost of the LGBT center.] </p>
<p>How much has Dartmouth, Colgate, Bowdoin, Yale, Bates, et al spent on alcoholic counseling? Im not trying to be cute, (although my wife tells me that I am, but I know she just says that to get me to do things) Im actually curious.
Drinking has been going on for generations. Gawd, the fraternity (drinking) scene at Hamilton, Colgate, Dartmouth, Amherst, and Middlebury, et al was far worse in the 70s than the problems today. And they are just the colleges I played at. Im sure it was the same across the country. Another thought, the drinking age was 18 in the 70s, and until 85 in Vermont, consequently almost the entire college population could drink legally. And drinking was much more accepted (pre MADD) days and colleges tolerated alcohol consumption much more than today. </p>
<p>At most colleges Im familiar with the students are assessed a damage fee if anything is done to college property. No college funds are used to support drinking. Quite the opposite, as many upset parents can attest when they receive the bill for dorm damages. </p>
<p>I guess Im not getting the emphasis on one college, Williams, and the poop covered walls. That would be considered art (read Mapplethorp) in some circles. </p>
<p>Fwiw-- After seeing piles of beer cans and liquor bottles in many dorms on a Sunday morning at some of the top LACs , along with the smell and sight of hungover students, the aforementioned helped dissuade my daughter from matriculating at more than a couple of colleges and forced her to give Smith second look.
Mini, my daughter was accepted at Smith and many LACs as yours (her SATs and stats are much higher than the norm at Smith)--- and like your daughter, even though I knew she wouldnt <em>fit</em> at a rural LAC or Ivy (drinking, frat scene) and she belonged at Smith, she had to come to that conclusion one her own. And I couldnt be happier she did.
Smith is like sushi. Both are acquired tastes and neither should be offhandedly assumed to be the right choice without a great deal of forethought.
However, if I were 18 again I would have a sex change operation and attend Smith before I would eat Sushi, but thats for another thread. </p>
<p>[The Ivies etc. have only been coed for 30 yrs."]
[For my alma mater it's over 35.] </p>
<p>I realize thaaaat. Picky, picky. Im from the Northeast. I was there. I should have said 30 PLUS. years.--- 2 points for you. </p>
<p>[check the list of female Congresspeople]</p>
<p>Women from most LACs and the Ivies are a hell of a lot smarter than to go into politics so they can talk out of both sides of their mouth. Whats your point?</p>
<p>Down boy.. ...kidding-lol </p>
<p>[check the 20% from women's colleges,. and then take a look at how old they are. Virtually all of them "could" have graduated from a coed Ivy of LAC; ]
[What I was saying is more than that. As a percentage of WOMEN on the AWS campuses, the percentage of female winners is a small fraction of what you find at the Seven Sister schools. (Swarthmore being the highest by some distance, but still low.) It certainly isn't a result of the "quality" of the students. It has to be because of something the colleges are doing once they get there] </p>
<p>Couldnt agree more. If I didnt believe that I wouldnt be paying 40+k a year for my daughters education. She /had/ other choices, not to mention some very nice merit awards
.. Btw--where did you get the idea to start with I had any derogatory sentiments regarding the quality of a Smith education?
Mimi, our kids are coming home in few days. Time to be happy and make lists of jobs--no free ride here-- you expect the kido to do when shes home not a time to argue. Cheers.</p>