<p>I dont understand why public schools go through the time and aggrivation to teach kids, regardless of intelligence. I mean god, if the kids aren't smart enough, they should just LEAVE and make room for the kids who are apt to live on Planet Earth. The dummies are all blemishes on the face of Mama Gaia.</p>
<p>Someday I'll build a big satellite and put all of the idiots in it, and they'll just fly off into space and never bother us again...</p>
<p>lol, do it soon please!</p>
<p>Its not like public school teachers are actually teaching kids. No, they are "test-teaching" kids so they won't fail a Statewide exam of some sort. Alot of your "dummies" are actually "lazys", but a the high school level it is difficult to distinguish. </p>
<p>Bsides, you need a labor force in your planet earth don't you? This less-intelligent do serve a purpose.</p>
<p>no, they're definitely dummies. and besides, if there weren't so many retards in our way, we could build a robotic labor force.</p>
<p>Amazing how sensitive you are.</p>
<p>and its not test teaching. if they do better on tests, they're learning. its not like the schools use Kaplan strategies to teach the kids how to take state tests. i never heard them teaching how to fill in the stupid bubbles.</p>
<p>therefore, they are teaching (no matter how slowly the kids learn), so the retards are in our way.</p>
<p>I think it is test teaching. Even if they don't tell you how to fill in the bubbles and teach strategies for test taking, the focus of everything that is taught is for a test. it's pretty much expected that you learn just what you need for the test and then forget it, and the teachers teach for that.</p>
<p>For some classes, that is very true. For three years, I was only taught what my teachers thought would be on the Graduation Exam</p>
<p>who cares about the motives for teaching; its still teaching nonetheless. ya they're teaching for the test, but the kids are still learning.</p>
<p>and why do you think the tests are even there? to set standards. and if the dummies were gone, there would be higher standards. all of the competent people could LEARN something. at my school, there are some big idiots in my class, and the work has to be slowed down so they could understand it. however, if people like that were gone, they would teach harder stuff. they're holding everyone back.</p>
<p>You could always work ahead on your own... or maybe even try tutoring the slower people. It might help.</p>
<p>Everyone has a right to education, and job opportunities are seriously limited to those without a diploma. Sometimes laziness isn't a factor at all, or is a byproduct of a bigger problem. Learning disabilities are real, and those who have them should not be punished or pushed aside because the top 5% are elitist.</p>
<p>ya but in stupid class, the stupid teachers get ****ed whenever someone read in class. so school is a waste of time. but it wouldn't be if they were gone for good.</p>
<p>Martha: why not? no matter how much education you give the kids, they'll struggle in life anyway.</p>
<p>Is nymets talking to himself?</p>
<p>Wouldn't be surprising.</p>
<p>And why is it that schools in Harlem suck nymets? Do you go to school in Harlem? Have you ever even been here?</p>
<p>Yeah by the media..why don't you come to Sugar Hill or Striver's Row and say it's poor considering the average apartment there is well over 750,000. Full of crime? I've never been robbed, stabbed, shot at, or anything like that...so no I do not know it's bad, and you should explain.</p>
<p>Wow, OP. Has anyone ever called you an elitist?</p>
<p>what is OP?</p>
<p>o. no, no ones said im elitist.</p>
<p>Ignorant a-hole I see.</p>
<p>You're an elitist.</p>
<p>lol</p>