<p>The results are basically what you expect. Wharton dominates (but does not monopolize) business. SEAS dominates (but does not monopolize) engineering stuff. SAS dominates (but does not monopolize) everything else.</p>
<p>Also keep in mind these are internships, which may not be exactly representative of hiring patterns for full-time jobs. I imagine Wharton students would be more aggressive in pursuing internships than SAS students</p>
<p>There is also a natural sampling bias as it was voluntary.</p>
<p>Some searches of distributions:</p>
<p>Penn students in New York (presumably the vast majority of which are in NYC): 251</p>
<p>Penn students in China: 5
SAS: 2
Wharton: 3
SEAS: 0</p>
<p>Penn students in Singapore: 4
SAS: 1.5 (dual-degree)
Wharton: 1.5 (dual-degree
SEAS: 1</p>
<p>Penn students in Japan: 4
SAS: 1
Wharton: 0
SEAS: 3</p>
<p>Penn students in UK: 9
SAS: 4
Wharton: 4
SEAS: 1</p>
<p>Penn students @ Morgan Stanley: 13
SAS: 2
Wharton: 7.5
SEAS: 3.5</p>
<p>@ HSBC: 3
SAS: 1
Wharton: 1
SEAS: 1</p>
<p>@ Apple: 2
SAS: 1
Wharton: 0
SEAS: 1</p>
<p>@ Microsoft: 4
SAS: 1
Wharton: 3
SEAS: 0</p>
<p>@ Monitor : 1
SAS: 1
Wharton: 0
SEAS: 0</p>
<p>@ Bain: 4
SAS: 1
Wharton: 3
SEAS: 0</p>
<p>@ McKinsey: 5
SAS: 1
Wharton: 4
SEAS: 0</p>
<p>@ Goldman Sachs: 23
SAS: 0
Wharton: 16
SEAS: 6</p>
<p>@ US Executive Branch (State Dept, Defense, White House, intelligence, etc): 10
SAS: 8
Wharton: 1
SEAS: 1</p>
<p>@ US Legislative Branch: 3
SAS: 3
Wharton: 0
SEAS: 0</p>
<p>@ US National Laboratories: 3
SAS: 1
Wharton: 0
SEAS: 2</p>
<p>@ Pharmaceuticals: 16
SAS: 4
Wharton: 4
SEAS: 8</p>
<p>@ "investment banking" writ large: 152 tools
SAS: 14
Wharton: 93+
SEAS: 35</p>
<p>@ "consulting" writ large: 62
SAS: 22
Wharton: 26
SEAS: 12</p>
<p>@ "private equity" writ large: 10
SAS: 2
Wharton: 7
SEAS: 1</p>
<p>@ "legal services": 5
SAS: 5
Wharton: 0
SEAS: 0</p>