Some Random from November 3rd

Test Preparation SAT Preparation
1

<p>So I think I got an 800 on math and a high 700 or writing and was hoping for a high 700 on reading but its starting to not look good.</p>

<p>What exactly was the "homo urbanous" answer. Are we sure it was "coin a term." What was the rest of the answer because "coin a term" doesn't seem to make sense really. He really wasn't trying to "coin" a term so much...</p>

<p>A SC question, something like "The critic reviewed the book <strong><em>, even the authors most ardent follows would find it a _</em></strong>"</p>

<p>For the Socratees passage. Was the answer ludacris, because it seemed a little harsh yet none of the others really made sense I guess. Also, the last paragraph was mainly for what? And apparently it was most like a play? I think I missed like 3 on that which is crazy. DANG!!!! </p>

<p>And two writing qustions- I think I got them both but not quite sure so I wanted to check. They're both pretty easy, I'm just overthinking!</p>

<p>For error ID's- Something about certain organizations formed based on farm unions (having formed) over fifty years ago. Was having formed wrong?</p>

<p>Vigerous student debate (with)... was with okay or an idiom error? </p>

<p>THANKS!!! Hopefully I can pull of mid 700 for CR but not at this rate.</p>

2

<p>In my opinion, the author of the homo urbanus passage wasn't coining a term. I thought he was using a <em>humorous</em> term for a growing trend.</p>

<p>Yes, the answer to the Socrates question is ludicrous. Philosophy tends to be considered outlandish and esoteric.</p>

<p>Having formed is wrong. The correct answer is "formed".</p>

<p>The correct idiom is debate on? or debate about? x__X</p>

3

<p>I put that the passage was dramatic
but I agree with looboo, I thought it was humorous not a coined term</p>

<p>yes I had ludicrous too</p>

<p>I'm not sure if I chose having formed, that was choice b right?</p>

<p>I remember the debate with, idiom error and should've been debate on</p>

4

<p>i agree that homo urbanas was humorous/satire.
annd i'm curious about the one with the author too cuz i hesitated on that one and in the end i picked words that i wasn't exactly sure of their meaning..</p>

5

<p>homo urbanus was playful. I am pretty sure because in the other thread, I put up the definition of coined term, and clearly coined term would NOT make sense.</p>

6

<p><em>Playful</em> and <em>coined term</em> were answers to different questions, though.</p>

7

<p>Oh, well, I meant humurous then. </p>

<p>I had dramatic for one of them, and humurous for the other one, OKAY Ms. "I never make a mistake because I'm always perfect" Looboo!!!</p>

8

<p>....? I never said I was 100% correct. Sheesh.</p>

9

<p>Don't "sheesh" me. Sheesh.</p>

<p>Did the original poster's question on the following get answered, because I forgot the answer and so I am curious as well?
"The critic reviewed the book <strong><em>, even the authors most ardent follows would find it a _</em></strong>"</p>

10

<p>Debate with? Can other's conform that it should be "debate on"</p>

<p>I would hate that. As long as it's not -3 and I doubt it missed 2 others.</p>

<p>And that SC never got answered.</p>

11

<p>I forgot that SC. :X</p>

<p>Do you remember some choices?</p>