<p>Hi, Mini, responding to your reply up above (post #26), yes, you were emphasizing what is possible EDUCATIONALLY if one can make an economical choice of an undergraduate program, and I should have picked up on that the first time I replied to you. How that balances out varies from learner to learner. </p>
<p>I've had the privilege of meeting you in my state twice, and I know you attended one of the more elite LACs, an undergraduate college at a much higher level of selectivity than the one I attended here. But I'm not sure, off-hand, how recently you've checked the engineering programs at various undergraduate colleges (the OP's concern) or whether you've ever been on the campuses of some of the top schools with engineering majors (including Harvard). I've been to the campuses (not particularly recently, but some as recently as 1998), and of course because of my son's interests I'm continually researching undergraduate programs that might appeal to a math-liking, and perhaps engineering-liking, young person. </p>
<p>It has been my privilege, as a state-university graduate, to learn Chinese well enough (after living abroad) to travel all over the United States as a Chinese-English interpreter. One frequently requested visit by official visitors to the United States from China is a visit to one or more elite university campuses, so I have been to most of them. I think it is not a correct comparison to say that the classroom and dorm room experience at, say, Harvard is almost the same as the experience at ASU. I've been to Cambridge, and I have been to Tempe (where I bought a T-shirt reading "Arizona State University: Truth, Knowledge, a Great Tan") and there are educationally relevant differences between the campuses. The fellow students at Harvard provide much more learning opportunity, as do the FABULOUS art museums at Harvard (which I have toured as interpreter for an artist), as do Harvard's phenomenal libraries, as does the surrounding metropolitan area of Boston-Cambridge. Phoenix is a nice town, but one does have to spend money to get away from there to get a good education to a degree that is not as strictly necessary for a student in Boston. Moreover (I know this better about MIT than about Harvard, but I think the same principle applies), the students at the very most elite, high-list-price colleges actually can get substantial travel grants, paid research opportunities, and other perqs of educational value for no additional out-of-pocket expense once they are admitted. So when a state university honors program (such as the one we look at here) says it provides, for example, a research stipend, that may only bring the program up to equality with HMP, not beat what's on offer at the other schools initially. </p>
<p>I see you were replying to another participant regarding alcohol abuse on campus. This is a worrysome issue to me, as the whole culture of drunkenness seems to have got worse at many campuses since our generation. (You have shared the figures on CC before, for which I am grateful.) I don't have any particular point of view on where my son would be at lowest risk for having classmates or dorm mates who might try to push him into binge drinking. I hear from the parents of math-liking young people at the elite schools mostly that their kids continue to be heavily into math after enrolling at those schools. I hope my son always finds computer programming more alluring than ethanol. Your point is granted that it may be less pervasive to abuse alcohol on a commuter campus than on a residential campus--but are the students who stay out of the drinking culture those who live off campus (as I did, in my dad) or those who necessarily stay near campus with other students because they have no family in town?</p>