<p>Are they a good indicator of the real thing?</p>
<p>I took 3 of them...600 first try (as a diagnostic), reviewed/prepped and got a 710 and 670.</p>
<p>It's a bit late for anything major (taking SAT IIs this Saturday!), but any answers would be appreciated =D.</p>
<p>I think they are good indicators. I took some from Princeton Review and Sparknotes, and they are very similar tests. Good luck!</p>
<p>Sparknotes is one of the most accurate test makers, math II wise.</p>
<p>Thank you, HotShot and jamesford!</p>
<p>I'm glad that they're accurate...I'm aiming for around 700 this weekend. I just wish Sparknotes had practice tests in more subjects.</p>
<p>wait so sparknotes = real test? i heard ppl say that sparknotes was a bit harder >< damn im really aiming for an 800 and just got a 730 on sparknotes</p>
<p>Sparknotes is harder than the real thing. I took the Math II test from the CB book (the one with all the subject tests) and got a very easy 790, while I barely get 680-710 in my 4 Sparknotes test. Obviously, the CB test is the most accurate since it was an actual test from 2001</p>