<p>The king of the angry posting, replete with ad hominems, calling other people out. Incredible…</p>
<p>“whimsical interpretations”? What are these? That you’re a ‘fanboi’ of Stanford as some of us are fanbois of public u’s? Why else would you post that link?</p>
<p>What I don’t understand is you’re also a fanboi of UT-Austin. Your defense of that school, which doesn’t need defending, was humorous, waaaaaay out of left field. So don’t tell me of whimisical.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Not in a devious bait-and-switch business sense, no. But ‘live up to your hopes’ - I don’t know what you mean. I was hoping for a savings in time, instead of reading accusations with no basis no link. </p>
<p>And I still don’t know what he meant by ‘quotes obtained from false pretenses.’ I know about the alleged misquote, but did the journalists supposedly misrepresent themselves?</p>