Stanford: hell or heaven?

<p>Stanford: hell or heaven? </p>

<hr>

<p>Hi!</p>

<p>I am a prospective stanford student, and would like your comments on a particularly negative review of stanford. If you are a stanford alumni, I especially appreciate your comment and expertise. I found this review on studentreview.com, and although it may be full of crap, how much truth is there within the comments. Even reading this gave me chills down the spine.</p>

<p>Also, i’m not trying to ■■■■■, just trying to find some advices. The studentreview.com comment is kind of long, so I am really sorry (you can just skim over it)</p>

<p>My characteristics:</p>

<li>prospective engineering physics or engineering (ChemE) student</li>
<li>passionate about learning: I don’t just want the degree, I would really like sensational (OK, maybe too strong adjective) lectures, inspirational comrades, and good research opportunities. How good is stanford for undergraduate research and grad school compared to a school like MIT or caltech?</li>
<li>strong work ethic</li>
<li>I have a strong aversion of grade-grubbers</li>
<li>I preferably like good grad school placement or employment opportunity or alumni connection system (I’m pretty sure Stanford’s strong on all three)</li>
</ol>

<p>Am I looking at the right place?</p>

<p>Thanks so much.</p>

<p>(supposedly from a stanford student) "Ah yes… Leland Stanford Junior University, what a great combination of Athletics and Academics, what a fun, talented and motivated student body, and what a great location to boot!</p>

<p>Before I begin, I will say there is some truth to Stanford’s well known selling points, but that the University, the student body, and the campus atmosphere also have their flaws. I will share my criticisms in list form:</p>

<p>Lack of idealism - Lack of committment to service and activism - Pre-professionalism</p>

<p>Stanford is not the campus for the budding social activist or political revolutionary. The vast majority of students here do not choose to use the power and influence of their education to advance change, but rather act in insulated self interest to preserve the status quo and stay on top of the heap. Stanford has often been described as an incubator for high tech companies, and that is truly what it acts as for students in many fields, a sheltered, artificially sunny bubble in which to “grow up”. Students may talk radically, but no one walks the walk. </p>

<p>Conformity - Elitism</p>

<p>Stanford students are a remarkably alike bunch. They often differentiate themselves in meaningless, tokenistic ways, but when it comes down to it most think and act remarkably similarly. The Stanford Student is white, s/he is from Southern California, s/he likes to skateboard and surf and lie in the sun, s/he makes biggoted jokes, always appears happy-go lucky, is intensely concerned with post college life and future financial security but does their best to hide it.</p>

<p>Lack of diversity - Racial insulation</p>

<p>Stanford is not diverse. True we have a lot of Asians but they keep to themselves, have no campus presence, and are even worse pre-professionals and elitists than the rest. Blacks and Latinos comprise about 15% of the student body, and have little influence. Campus ethnic centers and departments have been created, but these don’t do enough to make the campus truly diverse. Stanford fails diversity where many institutions do, by paying lip service to diversity but not embracing it. Furthermore there is widespread racial insulation. The ethnic theme dorms do not help this matter, nor does the de facto segregation between the white row houses and largely black apartment complex Mirrielees. Frat parties have the same token black faces week in and week out, while black parties attract few whites.</p>

<p>Astonishingly weak social scene - Very little dating</p>

<p>There is never anything fun to do on campus on the weekends. The frat parties are all the same, and they consist of many Stanford Students (as caricatured above) standing around drinking, saying what’s up to casual, insubstantial acquaintances, listening to the same tired records from 1996 by the same tired DJ, DJ Kenny G, and usually wearing Hawaiian shirts. Worse yet, there is usually only one such party to chose from! Then there are the many in room parties, which consist of alcohol, alcohol and more alcohol. Non-drinkers, enjoy! There are no parties with good music, good dancing, or good looking girls, unless you like bleary-eyed sorority girls who wear their Stanford sweatshirts three days in a row. So what are people doing? Are they dating? No of course not! First of all there is no where to go in the soulless wasteland that is Silicon Valley, secondly everyone is too driven, work-obsessed, out of touch with their feelings and disinterested in developing meaningful relationships of any kind for dating to occur.</p>

<p>Weather</p>

<p>Ah but the weather, can’t complain about that now can you? Actually, it is truly nice for maybe 4 months of the school year, not all year as they would have you believe. And even when it is warm during the day, even when it hits 90, it will be 40 at night. It is 40 every night in the bay area, meaning you often have to change clothes several times a day. And it rains non-stop during all of winter quarter. And when it rains you must either ruin your clothes getting to class by bike (thanks to our spacious 8000 acre campus), or set out by foot 30 minutes before you need to arrive. When it’s nice out though surely you can go swimming and stuff, right? Well yes and no. You see, because Stanford’s athletics are so top notch, they need some super nice facilities and they need to use them all the time, rest of the students be damned. The weight room is not open in the middle of the afternoon, nor before classes, and much of the equipment is old. There are no treadmills in the main weight room, and only two for the entire student body anywhere on campus. We have a great golf course too, but it costs $20 for students to play, and should you bring a guest who is not lucky enough to be enrolled in this great institution, plan on forking over $75. Where does all that money go to? Maybe Stanford’s $500,000 annual flower budget. Appearances, appaarences…</p>

<p>Location</p>

<p>There can be no worse college town than Palo Alto. Everything is overpriced and targeted to the Silicon Valley jet set. This goes for food, clothing, real estate, you name it. You want affordable, try East Palo Alto, the skeleton in Stanford’s geographic closet. This community of 30,000 is concentrated in a 2.5 sq mile area on the other side of Hwy 101 a careful bit of gerrymandering in the 60’s separated the two communities by the new highway which incidentally paved over East Palo Alto residences, in a similar fashion to the new hotel development in the area known as Whiskey Gulch where Jerry Garcia grew up, and Stanford students used to go hang out before they sold their souls sometime in the 1980s. Besides the immediate environs of the Peninsula, Stanford is lucky enough to be closest to the lamest and most Stanford like of the three bay area cities, San Jose! Lots to see and do there, trust me. The clubs on South First street are worth checking out once, but not returning to. Oakland and San Francisco, representing everything Stanford is not, are located about an hour away by car with no traffic, or anywhere from 2-3 hrs away at rush hour. Public transit, especially the BART, is very ineffective, especially in getting to Oakland. Both real cities in the bay are worth spending much time in, and there is plenty to do with or without your fake ID.</p>

<p>Sports</p>

<p>Winners of the Sears Cup 5 straight years, how can you complain? Well somehow our teams still aren’t much fun to watch. The Sears Cup is awarded based on overall excellence, and Stanford wins it each year with garbage sports that no one cares to watch like gymnastics, golf, water polo, and cross country. Stanford football, though it stumbled into the Rose Bowl last year thanks to a weak field of Pac 10 contenders, is sorry. Coach Willingham is great, but how come they still don’t have a running game, nor a special teams game, nor a decent secondary after three years??? Hmm, coach , you there? As for Basketball, this is the great Stanford success story of excellence in both academics and athletics. While this may be true most of the year, it comes to a grinding halt in March when the team gets straight C’s on their 12 units worth of exams and loses in the second round of the tournament. Why does this keep happening, because they lack athleticism, they have no guts, and their style of play breaks down against quick teams like Arizona, UConn and UNC. They rely too much on the three pointer and it always fails them in the clutch. Why does this keep happening? Because of Montgomery’s out dates style of coaching and the fact that Stanford can’t and never will attract true ballers because sadly, they wouldn’t belong.</p>

<p>After reading this review, I think you will know if you will fit in at Stanford and thus belong, and be happy; or if you are not The Stanford Student, and would be better off elsewhere."</p>

<p>Lack of idealism is completely wrong. If anything, stanford is way more idealistic than its peer schools as it is basically in a bubble. People inside are kinda naive (in a good way) and believe in the good of people. </p>

<p>Conformity - Elitism. THis one is way off. I have no idea who wrote it, and I doubt anyone in Stanford would agree. No point wasting space responding to it.</p>

<p>Lack of diversity - Racial insulation. This is interesting. EVERY SINGLE SCHOOL in the US besides really small schools has racial insulation. You WILL NOT SEE any place without it. People just tend to hang out with others that have similar background. </p>

<p>Astonishingly weak social scene - Very little dating.
THere are usually a lot of parties on Friday and Sat nights. Social scene is just like anywhere else. I dont see why stanford would be different from any of its peer schools.</p>

<p>Location. THis depends on anyone’s experience. You can try to look at it half empty of half full. I can tell you 100 things about why location is great. </p>

<p>Sports. THis is also dependent on everyone’s opinions. </p>

<p>I responded to your other posts. TO be honest with you, if you keep splitting hairs and ask questions without trying to answer them yourself first, it will be very hard for you to pick a good fit college. Besides, even if we tell you something bad about Stanford, are you really not gonna apply to it? How about Harvard, MIT, Caltech…etc or any other school you’re interested? Are you really not gonna apply to a school cuz some random stranger on CC told you it’s bad?
I hope you think of those questions first before posting, because it’ll save you a lot of time and energy.</p>

<p>Class of '74 Chem and Bio.</p>

<p>I had Linus Pauling, Paul Berg, Kornburg and three other Nobel Prize recipients teach courses. They usually were “terrible teachers” and admitted such and said read the book. Then we spent class discussing the why of what science is and learning their reasoning of their work. Learned why Watson decided on the double Helix for DNA.</p>

<p>Had one of the top world researchers/writers on Shakespeare teach a Shakespeare course at his home.</p>

<p>Had TAs only in labs.</p>

<p>Went to two Rose Bowls with Stanford Band (both of which we won). First in Tennis and Basketball (men and womens) and swimming.</p>

<p>Sat hours in the coffee shop talking with a Black Panther (I am a WASP) and others. Every meal in dorm different conversation on every topic. Pot at midnight in coed dorm in hallway with similar discussions.</p>

<p>Spent hours watching Star Trek with a bunch of guys and learning the true symbolism.</p>

<p>Going skinny dipping with coed dorm in school pool - having campus cops break us up and tell us that we “had better not be there on their next check at 3am”</p>

<p>Studied overseas in Germany. Took tours of Rome with Rome scholars. Took Private Tour of Vatican with scholar. Took private tour of Louve with world expert. Had world expert on microeconomic law as visiting professor. Argued Nietzsche with local German students. Worked as an interpreter at Munich Olympics.</p>

<p>It is an insulated college which is what makes it great. But it is also what you put into it.</p>

<p>My D is class of 2012, and I read her the above posts. She completely agrees with stanford2012!!. She LOVES Stanford.</p>

<p>Well to Stanford 2012</p>

<p>I actually thought about it a lot of time, but never visited the campus because of prohibitive costs. I already got in, so the application part is done.</p>

<p>The only educational things I’ve seen from Stanford are the Fourier analysis lectures on youtube, the Quantum Mechanics lectures on youtube (which I love!!), and a few ChemE lectures (not so interesting compared to the physics counterparts).</p>

<p>Honestly, I think that those lectures were not as good as their MIT ocw counterparts, which in turn are not as brilliant as the absolutely amazing Indian Institute of Technology lectures on youtube. </p>

<p>As I am heading toward a really prestigious school, I really wondered if that prestige also translated into an amazing education, where I could 10 years from now remember that awesome lecture I had from XYZ professor at stanford about Schrodinger’s equation.</p>

<p>Secondly, I don’t really care about the DivI sports success. I’m more interested in the research opportunities. How much of an advantage for grad school is going to Stanford as an undergrad going to be? Is there a lot of competition between undergrad students for research positions/publications?</p>

<p>My concerns are that Stanford earns its amazing reputation from its grad school, sth that is not reflected down to the undergrad school. I understand that stanford can be amazing for certain students. I just wonder if a partial geek/avid learner/ enthusiast about math and physics can find his niche here.</p>

<p>You should note that the student review was probably written about a decade ago. </p>

<p>My comments, though:
Lack of idealism: absurdly wrong. Starting a review with this statement forces me to question the author’s credentials. Seriously. This is the farthest thing from the truth.</p>

<p>Elitism: Wrong also. Definitely not as elite as some of the other schools I visited before choosing Stanford. Remarkably alike? Who wrote this? Most likely someone that made the wrong choice to attend and probably wasn’t very well liked. This is not true at all. </p>

<p>Lack of diversity: stanford2012 already said it. Also, the 15% thing is wrong–most likely because this was written about a decade ago. </p>

<p>Very little dating: Half of what he said is wrong. What is true is that, yes, many Stanford students have long-distance relationships, and frat parties are more or less alike. However, occasional hookups do still occur (as at every other college). No one is work obsessed; looks like someone wasn’t too popular in college. </p>

<p>Yeah, okay, I don’t want to refute every point of this review. It’s so blatantly wrong it makes me want to poke my eyes out with a fork. Whoever wrote this obviously made the wrong college choice and probably wasn’t very popular. Just know that (1) it was written years ago and (2) this person has a distorted view of the university.</p>

<p>As a personal note, I’m driven to go to grad school too. Research opportunities here are easy to get if you put the effort to get into a lab. Stanford isn’t going to throw random ads up. If you try to get into a lab (contact profs, etc), there’s a great chance you’ll get into one. However, take it easy; life isn’t about going to grad school. You’ll meet some amazing people and have some great memories at Stanford. Don’t be like the pre-med I know on the floor below me, who only leaves her room for (1) class, (2) the dining hall, or (3) the bathroom-- I’m serious. Stop looking at Stanford as a stepping stone for a great career and more as a stepping stone for new opportunities. Stanford can be both, but trust me, life is so much more exciting if you take the second route. </p>

<p>Lastly, there are so many people who like math/physics here, it’s insane. You should fit in fine, as long as you don’t put too much emphasis on academics and too little emphasis on getting to know people. If you find out you enjoy Math 51H, then math/physics is probably the major for you.</p>

<p>tl;dr version: review is wrong. If you have an open mind/willingness to try new things, Stanford is perfect for you.</p>

<p>As for undergrad research: to get an honors in a degree, you have to do research.</p>

<p>As to remembering professors, my post above states it.</p>

<p>Are they “great speakers” – mostly no. If you want someone who teaches the science, go to local Univ or College. If you want someone who did the science, go to Stanford (or Harvard…)</p>

<p>D is freshman at Stanford taking math and physics and loves it. She couldn’t believe some of the comments in post #1.</p>

<p>“So, to answer your original question, heaven, not hell.”</p>

<p>Thanks for the answer, but I am honestly not interested in alcohol (unless violence is a common thing at stanford).</p>

<p>What matters more to me are the academic opportunities.</p>

<p>D is also Stanford 2012 and finds almost all the points in the article “off the mark”.</p>

<p>She couldn’t be happier at Stanford, academically and socially. She is also a walk-on varsity athlete (something she might not have gotten a chance to do at other schools) and she finds the school spirit to be excellent, but not rabid as in some sports-centric universities. Her friends are exceptionally diverse (we are Asian), covering the spectrum in terms of culture and geography.</p>

<p>Faraday, are you from India?</p>

<p>I hope my dream university is a heaven~~~~</p>

<p>That review was obviously written by someone from a school other than Stanford. Everything was negative. Even the compliments were made in a back-handed manner to be negative. Do you think the 30,000 plus students who applied to Stanford last year see it this way?</p>

<p>I don’t know why you post a phony review made at least ten years ago. Do you expect someone to waste their time and refute everything in this “review”?</p>

<p>If you have a specific question, why not just ask the question? You say you already applied and got accepted? That doesn’t make any sense. Why didn’t you ask any questions before applying? I do question if you are a ■■■■■ or have a grudge against Stanford. However, on the internet, all speech is free so anyone is permitted to make inaccurate or outlandish claims. Knock yourself out.</p>