<p>
</p>
<p>English is my 3rd language. Do you speak 2 other languages more fluently than I speak English?</p>
<p>I simply stated that given your belief that an embrace of illogical thinking is a disqualification from having graduated from Stanford, I can narrow down the possibilities.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>1) Prove Stanford has no history</p>
<p>2) Prove Stanford does not practice now</p>
<p>3) Prove Princeton practices now</p>
<p>You are essentially just making junk up now. It’s not going to work because every post you make that involves any claims whatsoever I will ask you to prove. Every time you do not, you are telling the rest of this forum that you are not a credible source. That’s not what you want, is it? I suggest you start proving what you are saying.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>You didn’t read my post carefully enough. That claim is fine so long as you prove that Princeton’s stopping of yield protection was due to it being “caught.” First you need to prove that Princeton was “caught,” then that it reacted accordingly. Can you do that?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I will not lower my standards for your posts any more than I have already.</p>
<p>And I will be quadrilingual in a few months.</p>
<p>Princeton grads usually have only one option after graduation: getting a job that requires only UG degree. They have difficulty of getting into top MD PhD JD MBA programs (e.g. Stanford) because top graduate program very strongly prefer their own UG applicants. </p>
<p>Stanford graduate school will always welcom their own UG applicants ( with first priority)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Tell that to my friend who will be at Yale Law next fall.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>What a silly game:</p>
<p>1) Prove Stanford has a history. (Princeton does.)</p>
<p>2) Prove Stanford does practice now. (Princeton did.)</p>
<p>3) Prove Princeton does not practice now. (It did.)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Irrelevant. We’ve established the likelihood that Princeton did. You argued for the relevance of history in present-day situations. So prove Stanford did not.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>You claimed Stanford did not. Prove that claim now.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Harvard didn’t used to take black students. Now it does. See how times change? Prove that Princeton does now.</p>
<p>Do it or make yourself look worse – it’s really your choice.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Yeah, right. Klingon doesn’t count!</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Paper tigers first. The proof is in the pudding. Take off your striped lenses, why don’t you?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Oh man! Klingon doesn’t count! In that case, everything is different! Did I say quadrilingual? I actually meant quadrilingual. I guess that’s what you get for living in different continents. ;)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>That was WAY too easy. You just conceded defeat. I’m surprised it didn’t take longer.</p>
<p>No, I didn’t. To tell you the truth, I need to go P. (no pun intended) But if it makes you feel better…</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Yes, you did. You do every single time you do not prove your statements. 
You understand how this works, right?</p>
<p>Whatever helps you sleep at night.</p>
<p>So we have not yet seen any evidence that Princeton practices yield protection currently.</p>
<p>Thus it’s not a consideration.</p>
<p>I’m glad this has been resolved.</p>
<p>there we go, so iamtbh is a 19 year old Menlo Junior College foreign Asian student that once in a while walks on the Stanford campus and attempts to feel what it would be like to be an HYPSM student…he does speak 3 languages however.</p>
<p>his only desire in life is to post negative comments about Princeton. He claims that he never got rejected from Princeton, but that is only because he couldn’t find the words to write the essays in the Princeton Supplement Application - so therefore never applied.</p>
<p>figures</p>
<p>"(1) I never said where I matriculate because unlike you, I don’t feel the need to ■■■■■ for my university.</p>
<p>(2) I am 19 (which I did reveal). So, as of now, I have only graduated from high school."</p>
<p>Remember !!</p>
<p>At Yale Law, 5 times more Yale UG than Princeton UG are enrolled.<br>
at Harvard law, again 5 time more Harvard UG than Princeton UG
Stanford Law, 5 time more Stanford UG than Princeton UG
Columbia Law, 5 time more Columbia UG than Princeton UG</p>
<p>at Princeton Law school… sorry princeton doesn’t have law school. </p>
<p>Princeton UG are very unlikely to get into top MD PhD JD MBA program.</p>
<p>yay for german_car and making up numbers and using them in ways that are meaningless! </p>
<p>PRINCETON -> LAW = HORRIBLE PATH!!! (see ex. Sotomayor, Alito, Kagan)</p>
<p>pimp, could it be that iambth is “son of german_car”?</p>
<p>how could two individuals hate Princeton so much?</p>
<p>You tend to hate what you can’t have 
I’ll let the implications of that be inferred as they may.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>A paper tiger cannot change his stripes:</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Relating to yield protection:</p>
<p>1) Prove Stanford has no history</p>
<p>2) Prove Stanford does not practice now</p>
<p>3) Prove Princeton practices now</p>