<p>just want to clear up some misinformation:</p>
<p>Stanford econ is ranked higher than Penn. In academia, the economics department has much higher prestige than being on the faculty at a business school, even Wharton.
Abel, Khilstrom and Winter are the only three Fellows of the Econometric Society who teach in all of Wharton. Except for Steele in OPIM and maybe a handful of others, there are not many senior faculty at Wharton who are as impressive as tenured profs in Penn CAS econ.</p>
<p>It parallels the top math people going into pure areas- </p>
<p>i.e. pure > applied in the math hierarchy and econ department in A&S > finance/econ at a business school </p>
<p>even though b-school professors tend to earn a lot more.</p>
<p>In terms of a rigorous education, there is no question that a CAS major in econ is much stronger than a peer at Wharton. However, a rigorous education is not the same as best job placement/feeder for Wall Street, for which Wharton is traditionally much better.</p>
<p>Penn CAS has quite a number of superstars- Diebold, Schorfeide, Randy Wright, Mailath, Merlo, Matthews, Postlewaite, Rios-Roll come to mind. Not to mention Larry Summer’s dad, Robert Summers, and Nobel winner Klein (both emeritus). Excellent department in macro, micro, international and econometrics.</p>
<p>Stanford of course has its own set of superstars- Arrow, Bagwell (recent senior hire from Columbia), Bernheim, Greif, Hoxby, Hong, Krueger, Taylor, Piazzesi, Milgrom and there are probably several glaring omissions)</p>
<p>All in all, Stanford vs. Penn in econ is tough.</p>
<p>1) Stanford econ > Penn CAS econ > Wharton econ </p>
<p>^first inequality is weak</p>
<p>but</p>
<p>2) for Wall Street recruiting: Wharton econ >> Stanford econ = Penn CAS econ</p>