<p>Hi all, this is my first time posting here. I am applying to top Ph.D programs in Architectural History. I have a 4.0 in both of my concentrations (History and Architectural History) and a 3.85 overall. I attend an Ivy League university. I have TA'd in my subject for the past two years and I have been having meetings with professors at the various schools to which I am applying. I had been prepping for the GRE for the past few months.</p>
<p>On every practice test I have taken, my verbal has been consistently better than my math score: that disparity is reflective of my abilities. I was usually scoring in the mid-700s on verbal and the mid 600s on math which put me in about the 99th percentile and the 70-something percentile respectively.</p>
<p>But, I took the test for real yesterday and got a 740 math and a 640 verbal. These scores are absolutely baffling to me. What bothers me the most is that these scores are NOT reflective of my abilities at all. I worry about the programs to which I am applying assuming that I am not proficient verbally and I am wondering if I should retake the test. </p>
<p>I would appreciate any advice that you have. I know that some schools consider GREs only as an afterthought and that they are often not a determinant of one's acceptance. Still, if this would in any way hurt my chances, I would prefer to retake. Please advise me!</p>