<p>If an FRQ asks for 2 things (like social AND political effects), and you know 1 very well (say political effects) but you have close to no idea for the other (social, in this case), would it be advantageous to just discuss 1 of them in depth and kind of gloss over the other?</p>
<p>Or would it be better to pick an FRQ where you have some knowledge (using the above example, more knowledge than you do about social effects, but less about political) about both parts and write decent paragraphs on each?</p>