<p>Younghoss, there is nothing whatsoever that compares this list to a ‘one time tease.’ First, it was not one time as far as the actual article reports. Second, it was publicly distributed. Third, identifying such girls on a list is not remotely equivalent to verbally calling someone a derogatory name (especially not an anonymous entity). Fourth, I am not a lawyer, but neither are you. And really why are you splitting hairs when this obviously comes so close to libel, harassment or sexual harassment, all depending upon where one lives. </p>
<p>The very sick part is, the question one has to ask is why would you be defending it?</p>