<p>My guess, as someone who has been interviewing and hiring people for a number of years (past my fingers, running out of toes in counting them), is it is a combination of factors that are probably working against your S. A tough economic climate, along with things like having positions frozen, not really having positions, etc as other people have, also means companies are really, really picky with who they hire, and they probably have a ton of ultra high quality candidates they have to choose from, all of whom probably have great CV’s, grades, etc.</p>
<p>So when they are choosing, everything counts, and fit is right up there, personality, call it what you will. It is probably one of the more undefined areas of companies, but in general when they interview it is not only if they think the person has the skills to do the job, but fit in with whatever is going on there. I work in IT, and I have seen a lot of really, really topnotch talent who in some environments, like big banks and places like that, would work great, but in the high pressure/rapidly moving entrepeneurial environment that I work in, would not fit in well (as an example, though my firm is hard charging and such, the people are pretty laid back though serious about what we do, and someone who came in who was all about career building, icing in the notches in the belt and like would go over like a lead balloon (would do great at an investment bank, however). And as unfair as this sounds, a lot of time it comes down to gut instinct about that fit, after working with people you get the feeling of what will fly and what won’t. </p>
<p>Actually, I think the quote when the S said something like “Oh, I guess we are back to the prom queen, etc thing, I thought I was past that” is pretty telling to me. While I can understand the feelings (I wasn’t exactly king of the prom material myself), that also betrays something he is going to have to realize, that no matter how bright you are, no matter how many skills you have, awards, etc, in the end when you work someplace you have to work with other people, and personality and interpersonal skills mean a lot, as much frankly as being able to run a spreadsheet or whatever. It would be terrible if people are taken on looks alone, or being a glad hand charley, but in most job positions that isn’t true; however, because so many have probably as good or better cv’s, experience, skills and so forth, you need to be both the guy with the hashmarks and the person that others can work with and like. I have run into people who technically and experience wise were brilliant, but destroyed the chemistry of teams and companies because they simply didn’t value the interpersonal and saw everything as cold, hard “this is the right thing to do, the company is everything, etc”. (I want to add that I am not referring to the S in question, who I don’t know at all, I am offering hypotheticals). Mensa is full of people with incredible intellectual ability, and many of them on the other hand find themselves locked into dead end careers, limited job growth or expansion, and a lot of it is personality quite frankly. From my grad school days, there is also evidence that the ones who come out with the 4.0’s from high end schools, all the honors and whatnot, often don’t make the best employees, that the “avis students” as they have been called have the motto “we’re number 2, so we try harder”, which includes working with people. </p>
<p>I’ll give you something I think is an apt analogy. In the world of music, specifically but not alone classical music, there are these music students who just burn up the firmament, they have been playing high level repertory since they were 10, practice many hours a day,win competitions, get into high level music schools…and then founder.Music is always as tight as things are now for everyone, even in the best of times, and the competition is incredibly fierce the whole path.What is the difference between someone who makes it and doesn’t? In the end, it comes down to things that aren’t just about being technically superior; it is in being able to express the emotion of the music, of being able to connect to an audience as well as playing well. In an orchestra or group situations, a big part once you audition and get in, is how you work within the dynamics of the group (orchestras routinely have a 1 year probation period, to see if they work out, as well as interviews with orchestra members as part of the hiring process). It is no different in workplaces, it is identical.</p>
<p>Another key word that came up was when I heard “he gives long, detailed answers when asked a questions”. Having that kind of problem myself (take a look at this post and its length!), sometimes it is hard to frame things in short, simple statements, but that is important in an interview, something I have to be careful about like I just said. When someone gives long, detailed answers to questions, besides at times coming off like someone is a know it all, or someone full of ‘theory’, it also gives the interviewer pause, that in a work situation, will this person do the same thing? Will they when you need a quick answer go off on a long, involved discussion, when a yes or no would do? Will if given something to work on, will they analyze it to death and take far longer to do something then is necessary? As an interviewer, this is critical, when asked a question you want something more akin to bullet points on a Power Point slide, then William F Buckley writing on the decline of western civ:). The other thing about long winded answers is it often stops the interviewee from listening to the other person, and listening is as critical on an interview as talking, in taking in what the interviewer is saying and being able to really digest it and then talk about it, ask questions and so forth. Keep the answers on point, don’t try to impress the interviewer with depth of knowledge unless they ask for it, and otherwise listen and interact, that is a top 10 trick. </p>
<p>I would recommend having him see a career coach/counsellor, some of them are really, really good (if finding one, try to find people who have used them, these days a lot of people looking to get into an area with hot growth, are setting themselves up in the business…and many are poltroons…). A good one can analyze your son’s style and see where the problems are, and also when an interview comes up can help S with how to figure out the company culture from what has been written about it, and also observing when you go to the company to interview. Is everyone sitting intently at their cubes, working silently? Do you see people interacting, talking to together, laughing, and so forth? Culture can be picked up looking at the work space as you pass in, and can be used in determining how best you could fit in there. See how the interviewer interacts with you, is he/she formal, are they more low key? Do they come off as friendly and interested, or a functionary doing their job? Learn to read that, and it increases your chances. </p>
<p>I feel for him, I know what that kind of rejection is like, I spent more then a few months after being laid off looking for a new job, interview after interview, heard i was a strong candidate, etc, then nothing…figured out I was interviewing the wrong places, that didn’t fit me either. In a tight job situation you often don’t have that opportunity, so you have to make the effort to find how to fit in, come off as ‘one of the guys’ or whatever. Also tell him bad times don’t last forever, that if by some chance the internship doesn’t play out there is still plenty out there going down the road (yeah, in some fields like when in law school internships can mean a lot, or in investment banking and the like, but on the other hand, plenty of kids get jobs out of college who never interned anywhere). Frustration and bitterness can play out in interviews, it can some out unintentionally, so being positive and optimistic is the way to go, even though he may feel like Digger O’Dell or something. I wish him well.</p>