<p>koala717, the vast majority of elite (if you'll pardon the expression), secular and non-military institutions of higher learning in the country have student bodies that are significantly left of center, Dartmouth not withstanding. However, in my opinion it is pretty much meaningless to call oneself a liberal or conservative unless one knows what the terms really mean. To take an informed stance, for starters a person needs an understanding of macroeconomics (including supply & demand, scarcity, monetary, fiscal & tax theory, etc.). In addition, knowledge of history (e.g. civil rights, suffrage, gender equality, collective bargaining, workplace safety, child labor, pollution, resource depletion, slavery, treatment of natives and immigrants of color and non protestant religions, etc.), psychology (human motivation), philosophy (e.g. concepts of liberty, freedom vs. determinism, social obligation, ethics, etc.), science (e.g. global warming, deforestation, desertification, species decimation, evolution, statistics, anthropology, etc.) and religion are a must. And this compendium is hardly exhaustive.</p>
<p>I have never met a 22 year old, much less an 18 year old, that has had time to do more than scratch the surface of more than a few of these disciplines. Nevertheless, everybody, pretty much, is a conservative or a liberal anyway. What else can they be? Undecided? </p>
<p>The good news is that college provides (or at least is supposed to provide) the foundation and starting place for gaining the knowledge required to take an informed political/economic stance. Spirited debate among and between peers (called bull sessions back in the dark ages) forces a young adult to begin synthesizing newly acquired information and to defend positions against concerted attack. In my opinion, Swarthmore is without a doubt the wrong school for anyone who does not relish the prospect of acquiring the knowledge necessary to inform the opinions they have picked up from assorted sources (e.g. parents, school, friends, church, etc.) during their formative years and does not have the confidence that their intellect will hold them in good stead when they are asked to defend those so informed positions.</p>
<p>I myself am socially liberal (with a couple of stark exceptions) and fiscally middle of the road, for lack of a better term. However, my Swat soph son accused me of being a Puritan (me?) in the middle of a recent heated debate. I took solace in the fact that he still hasn't learned that much compared to the fossil that I certainly am.</p>
<p>At any rate, my very liberal son who still has a lot to learn (don't we all) has a passion for debate and only has contempt for those who take positions they can't begin to defend (i.e. he can't abide fools). I believe he is a typical Swat. A Swat will likely respect you if you can back up what comes out of your mouth with reasoned thoughtful argument. It's not that much to ask.</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>