<p>^Uh are you serious, definitely Fox.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>The filibuster is supposed to mean “the right to unlimited debate”. Filibustering = debating/talking/delaying is supposed to block cloture until “debate” comes to an end. These days the opposition doesn’t actually have to filibuster, they only say they’re going to filibuster. So I’ll repeat my statement: They should go back to actually having to filibuster instead of just saying they’re going to filibuster and not have to do it – because I’m sick of this Republican filibuster nonsense. And it was hardly a bipartisan vote; only one Democrat, Ben Nelson, actually defected. Reid switched his yes vote to a no vote for procedural purposes. If the majority leader does so, he is allowed to reintroduce the bill later. So touting that doesn’t hold much weight.</p>