TeamRocketGrunt's General Guide to Getting Involved in Research

<p>Hey guys. I've gotten a few questions about the research work I do, how to get involved with research, etc., and I thought that I'd make a general purpose guide to kind of help those of you who are wondering what is actually meant by "research" and how you can get involved in it. Fair warning, I'm typing this at midnight-ish my time, so I'm a bit tired; as such, I'd appreciate it if you could just ignore any typos/grammatical inconsistencies. </p>

<p>Section 1: What is research?
When most high school students talk about research, they're generally talking about looking something up; for example, if I were researching Linus Pauling, I'd look up facts about his life, his work, etc. When the high schoolers on CC talk about research, the term takes on a completely different meaning. Research, or more specifically laboratory research, is pursuing the study of a scientific topic and trying to determine/prove something that hasn't already been explored or proven. It is not, contrary to popular belief, simply "Googling" things; the kind of research this thread addresses is going to a lab and working on a scientific or mathematical project. To distinguish the two types of "research," let's consider this: you're a person (high schooler, college student, whatever) who wants to test the effects of, say, compound A on the expression of a gene in cell type A. After some Googling, you find out that no one has explored this idea in depth, so you don't know what will happen if you expose cell type A to compound A; if you take this idea to a professor and convince him/her to let you work under him/her, you are doing a research project. This is starkly different from our Linus Pauling example outlined above. This is actual scientific research, the kind you'd see in news headlines (although, our cell example probably won't end up on the news :D)</p>

<p>Section 2: How can I begin doing research work?
Well, firstly, figure out which field interests you. Do you like computer science? Biology? Chemistry? Once you figure out your area of interest, you can begin contacting professors. If you live near a university, then just Google "(field name) professors (university name)" and you should be able to find a list of the professors who work/teach in that specific field at the university. Once you've found a list of professors who work in your area of interest, think about your goals with research. What do you want to accomplish? Is your goal to enter and maybe win one of the big science fairs (ISEF, ISTS, Google, etc.)? Do you want to publish your work? Do you want to just observe and learn? Generally, high schoolers who want to do research fall into either the "I want to help my professor on his/her project and just learn" (category A) or the "I want to learn, but I also want to do my own project and enter it into science fairs/publish" (category B). </p>

<p>IF Category A:
Simply email one of the professors in the area you're interested in and be sincere; tell him/her that you just care about learning and would value the research experience. Do some amount of background reading so you at least know what you're talking about. I will have a category A template email below.</p>

<p>IF Category B:
You'll have to be a bit more thorough in your email. If you want to spearhead your own project, you will need to have an idea of what you're talking about before venturing into contact with the professor. You will obviously need to know what it is you want to research. Furthermore, you will need to narrow your professor search down quite a bit. Let's say that you want to do research in computer science. While category A people would be fine with just choosing any professor in computer science since their intent is to learn a bunch of computer science only, you, a category B person, cannot afford that luxury. You have to have a more specific idea of what you want; do you want to do research in Markov Decision Processes, or do you want to explore using Bayesian networks for novel tasks? If you want to do research in MDPs, have a good initial knowledge of what MDPs are, and find a professor whose research interests involve MDPs or have some kind of overlap with MDPs. A computer science professor won't accept your request to join his lab if you say you want to work with a new cancer drug, for example, so having overlap/relevance with/to his lab's goals is basically a must. If you're in category B, I'll assume you're pretty serious about research, so having a research proposal at least partially done before venturing into it would be a very good idea. Basically, if we use our MDP example again, say you want to create a novel search tool (like CTRL+F) using MDPs. You could go about addressing this in several ways.
1. You could email the professor and say that you are interested in building a novel search tool with MDPs, and he
can guide you further and give you access to papers.
2. You can look up ideas yourself and read relevant papers until you have a good idea of how you want to do your
project and THEN email the professor.</p>

<p>Either way, the professor will probably want a research proposal from you before he actually starts letting you work on your own project; by reading a proposal, a professor will be able to see if you are at least conversational in the topic that you want to pursue. If you pursue option 2, you will look a little more impressive to the professor, but option 1 is still very viable. You will need a lot of background knowledge in your topic if you want to work on an independent project in it (when I say independent, I don't mean by yourself; I mean under a professor, but your own project). A category B email template will be included in a separate post due to the character limit on posts.</p>

<p>Section 3: How do I gain background knowledge?
Depends on the field, to be completely honest. If you want to work in something like biomedical engineering, reading papers and deciphering the jargon is the best way to go about it. If you want to work in computer science, reading papers is still the best way, but you will have to have programming knowledge and, depending on where you're going, very good mathematical foundations. Don't expect to start an independent project in comp sci without having a very good handle on programming in a particular language or languages first. If you're going into the more "comp sci" part of things (the theory, artificial intelligence, etc.), you'll need a very good mathematical base. For subjects that are not comp sci or mathematics, though, you don't need much specialized pre-knowledge; just read papers and decipher the jargon until you become conversational in the general area of your topic. After you've hit that point, read papers more relevant to what you specifically want to do and sink your teeth into those. A good example would be if you wanted to study the effects of G-proteins on the activity of cAMP, you should first have a good understanding of signal transduction pathways in general, which you get by reading papers. Once you get a good understanding, read papers on the mechanisms through which the G-proteins work, the molecular structure of cAMP, etc. </p>

<p>Category A email template (assume the professor's name is John Doe, and he is a bio sciences professor at Podunk State. He works with G-proteins and cAMP). You should add/delete whatever you feel like, but this is a general idea of what it should look like:</p>

<p>Dr. Doe:</p>

<p>Good evening. My name is TRG, and I am writing to inquire about a research position in your lab. I am currently a high school student, but I would very much like to gain some research experience in biological sciences; your field, in particular, fascinates me. I would appreciate it if I could work under you in your laboratory so that I may learn as much as possible about your field. I believe that the hands-on experience would be invaluable.
Regards,
TRG</p>

<p>Category B email template (same conditions as above):</p>

<p>Dr. Doe: </p>

<p>Good evening. My name is TRG, and I am looking for a mentor for a project I have in mind. My proposed project deals with the relationship between cyclic adenosine monophosphate and G-proteins; I believe there is a significant connection between the two which lead to their pronounced effect on signal transduction throughout the cell. I have attached a proposal, and I would appreciate it if you could read through it and give me feedback on how I may make my methodology or idea more scientifically sound.</p>

<p>I believe this topic falls under your research interests, and I would be grateful if you would look upon my mentorship request favorably.</p>

<p>Best regards,
TRG</p>

<p>Section 4: Do I have to have a mentor to do research?
Not necessarily. Not having a mentor puts you at a pretty significant disadvantage for the big science competitions, especially if you’re doing work that’s not in computer science or mathematics. For a lot of biomed projects, which need cell cultures and specialized equipment, a lab is almost essential; there are examples of projects that don’t require labs to carry out. The 2013 ISTS winner did some stuff with algae, and she worked mostly out of her house; she had algae “gardens” under her bed, basically. Depending on your topic, it’s very possible to do research work without a mentor, but it is pretty challenging. Some topics cannot be done without a lab or access to lab equipment.</p>

<p>If you have any suggestions/questions/comments/additions, feel free to post them below. </p>

<p>What if you’re too shy to talk to a professor and there are no universities near you?
And you don’t have a car and your parents are always gone so they can’t drive you anywhere?</p>

<p>You can email them. You could always bike 10 miles.</p>

<p>@wcao9311 I don’t have a bike. I used to but not anymore. And by talking to the professor I mean when I actually get to the lab.</p>

<p>Then don’t do research </p>

<p>@dsi411:</p>

<p>If you have no way of getting to a lab, then you may be able to do research at home. See Section 4. If you can get to a lab but are too shy to speak, that’s on you; you’ll have to overcome that yourself. </p>

<p>Thanks. I guess I don’t really need to do professional research or anything, I’ll just try to do something sciencey during summer vacation if I don’t get into the summer program I applied to. I’ll also try applying to one of those research summer programs in the future.</p>

<p>@dsi411:
I still suggest looking into some more at home research you can do. Those summer programs are extremely competitive and not having research experience can weigh against you (although, there are people who get into programs like RSI with no experience). You just have to communicate a thirst to learn and a passion/love for science/math.</p>

<p>Yeah, I know I’m probably not gonna get into those research programs so I’ll try something at home. It’s probably not gonna be super professional since I don’t have a professor or anything to talk to. But I’ll try anyways.</p>

<p>—deleted—</p>

<p>You’re perfect @TeamRocketGrunt. Thank you so much for this. I don’t have any questions off the top of my head right now, but I’m sure I’ll come up with some for you later. ;)</p>

<p>@Almondjoy7: no problem. If you have any questions, just relay them here or PM me. </p>

<p>@TeamRocketGrunt How would you describe the work the professor conducts/you are helping the professor with? Impossible, manageable, etc.? And what’s the best way to learn how to not scrub so hard once you get to the lab?</p>

<p>Btw I like your avatar. Pokemon FR/LG was my childhood.</p>

<p>This is great. </p>

<p>Just sayin’, I’ve always sorta hated biology and chemistry oriented students who pursue research. Finding research in bio/chem is so EASY. How does this virus affect this organism? How does this organism react to this chemical?</p>

<p>So easy. Physics-oriented students, on the other hand (and comp-sci too I suppose) have to actually think. Not just mix stuff in Petri dishes.</p>

<p>It is so much harder finding research in theoretical fields. I tried all last summer at Cornell. No takers. Eventually I landed some applied physics/astrophysics/astronomy research. </p>

<p>@TeamRocketGrunt, would you say it’s necessary to include a resume’?</p>

<p>^I don’t think Summer at Brown will help you much at selective schools. Be more positive about research and expand your options to include more than just research and summer school for rich kids.</p>

<p>@ScrewCC: I disagree. I will concede that a topic in pure bio (wood science, ecology, env. sci, etc.) is laughably easy and, quite frankly, boring; however, pure chemistry, biochemistry, biomedical engineering, and chemical engineering are not at all easy. Pure chemistry can branch into theoretical chem, applied chem, etc. like the branches of physics; both are physical sciences. Biochemistry and chem eng. involves a lot of organic knowledge, which is notorious for being one of the hardest courses you can take on an undergraduate level. Biomed. eng is like a hybrid between biochem and chem eng., so it has its own difficulties associated with it. I think a reason why physics and comp sci (and math, as well) are viewed as harder is because of the level of pre-requisite knowledge required (you must have very strong backgrounds in math and physics to do physics research, must be very good at math to handle the theoretical part of comp sci, etc.); while the other disciplines may be easier to jump into initially, they can get very very complicated later on. Of course, it’s a matter of personal taste; I’ve never been good at physics (not as good as I am with biochem), but I’d like to major in physics because having a good physics background will allow me to do chem. eng research as well as biomed. research, since physics teaches you, above all, to think. Besides, a lot of the engineering research is based on physical concepts, so a good background helps a lot in those cases. For my work (I’m working with nanosystems/chem. engineering), it’s definitely more than just mixing stuff in petri dishes. </p>

<p>As for the actual topic itself, some of the biochem stuff is so specific that it’s extremely hard to come up with a novel topic. If you pick a simple question (“How do these viruses react with this protein?”), I can guarantee you that there are already dozens of papers detailing exactly what happens. The hardest part of biochem research (or any research, for that matter) is coming up with a novel idea; I know that for my work, every idea I had had already been done by some group of scientists. Now, I’m working with an idea that I, to the best of my knowledge, think is novel.</p>

<p>I wouldn’t say you’d have to include a resume, especially if it’s your first time doing research (I mean, the professors are busy; they’re not going to look through your resume and use your experience in club X to determine whether they want to take you on). The only thing a prof would really care about is if you’ve done prior research; if you have, then go into a bit of detail on what you did in your email, and attach a document that goes into very fine detail (in the email, say something like, “I’ve attached a more comprehensive explanation of my work in project X”). If you’ve done a lot of previous research (like, several studies/trials/projects), then listing them on a resume would be more efficient. </p>

<p>@ApplesTo: other than those fields, what are you interested in? As for summer@Brown, I’d advise against it; the programs that are based on ability to pay aren’t very highly regarded. You’re better off pursuing something that’s actually interesting and shows your passion for whatever it is you like.</p>

<p>bump</p>

<p>what do you recommend as a minimum background knowledge for the general science? honors bio, ap chem, ap bio, community college courses, etc.</p>

<p>I want to do research, but I’m afraid that my background knowledge isn’t enough (in terms of classes)</p>

<p>bump?</p>