<p>Chicago is a world-class university, and shares with other great American universities a number of strengths: strong faculty across many fields, smart, interesting students, lots of chances for people to learn from each other, diversity in backgrounds and interests, tremendous resources supporting learning and research. </p>
<p>There are two related qualities that I think distinguish Chicago from the nation’s other great universities at the undergraduate level:</p>
<p>First, more than any other university, Chicago has a culture in which there is widespread agreement that what happens in the classroom (and in work done for courses) is vitally important, more so than what goes on outside the classroom. That doesn’t mean that no one cares about social things or extracurriculars at Chicago. People do care. But what they are doing in class is central to the experience of practically everyone there. And that isn’t necessarily true at the other top universities.</p>
<p>Second, there is a tremendous commitment to rigorous, but respectful debate. People shout political slogans at each other at Chicago less than anyplace else I know. No one, on the left or the right, thinks that’s ever appropriate. People really listen to one another and respond with careful logic and marshaled evidence. And they change their minds – even if only slightly – in response to good points made by others. Unfortunately, that’s more rare than it should be, but it’s deeply part of the culture at Chicago.</p>
<p>Chicago has had many famous faculty on the right and on the left, but none of them has ever been superficial or demagogic. And they talk to each other, across political divides. (For example, the Law School dean who hired Barack Obama to teach is a committed right-winger.)</p>
<p>I would note, too, that Chicago is on the whole more left-liberal than anything else – just like the rest of American elite universities – but it has stronger representation of conservative views than its peers, so discourse is more balanced. By “conservative,” though, I mean free-market libertarianism. Social or religious conservatives are a tiny minority, and barely noticeable.</p>