<p>thanks dck7</p>
<p>GOOD LUCK EVERYONE. i think it's time to wait til Dec 23rd... ohh the dreaded</p>
<p>Pass it on.
What did people get for these? </p>
<p>Bronte passage:
Between metaphorical vs literal use? </p>
<p>Duncan:
Meaning of giving more HW? limit teaching ability? </p>
<p>My answers for some of the more debated ones:</p>
<p>Passionate - there was no support for pretentious
Library vocab - unfettered
Broach bring up
Duncan - DEFINITELY sensitive to requests
Kind was mocking</p>
<ol>
<li>yes</li>
<li>yes</li>
</ol>
<p>pretentious
unfettered
bring up
sensitive
and mocking</p>
<p>only difference was passionate/pretentious</p>
<p>explain 2</p>
<p>I thought it was he couldn't control his class according to the quote per se.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Between – metaphorical vs literal use?
[/quote]
I put mediation and obstruction instead of that metaphortical one</p>
<p>dave,
i think the consensus was limit his teaching abilities
ks,
that is another debated one</p>
<p>haha thanks hostyoutube :P </p>
<p>there's a pretty big debate between metaphorical + literal vs mediate and obstruct. It could go either way, if I got it wrong oh well. </p>
<p>What did people think about the "tapes not playing" question. To compare their students or show Mo fails as a teacher? I'm pretty sure it was compare because the Mo fails choice was worder in a way that made it tempting but incorrect</p>
<p>I don't think the giving hw one was to limit teaching ability....anyone have the other answers for it? I don't remember my answer, but if someone has them I can tell you.</p>
<p>that was defly compare becaseu he was comparing to how his students acted as opposed to in mo's class. </p>
<p>ISSUE CLOSED</p>
<p>I dont' get how that one is "literal vs metaphorical though."</p>
<p>"Between" in both cases seems to be both metaphorical. I mean does Charlotte Bronte literally "stand between?"</p>
<p>^^^ good, I'm glad someone isn't going to equivocate (lol....I was nearly tempted to pick that word)</p>
<p>Charlotte could be construed as literally obstructing biographers</p>
<p>cc3c, don't u have like a 2300+? Why are you taking it again lol?</p>
<p>Umm the scientist with the mistinterpret, misinform one is equivocal...
<p>–adjective 1. allowing the possibility of several different meanings, as a word or phrase, esp. with intent to deceive or misguide; susceptible of double interpretation; deliberately ambiguous: an equivocal answer.<br> 2. of doubtful nature or character; questionable; dubious; suspicious: aliens of equivocal loyalty.<br> 3. of uncertain significance; not determined: an equivocal attitude.<br>
</p>
<p>2400!!! which i lost since i skipped a math q</p>
<p>for the giving hw one, im prety sure i put A..but i dont remember what it said</p>
<p>But also it could be "deplorable." Trust me I am sure it's deplorable. Scientists are having lamentable actions that are deplorable.</p>
<p>it was deplorable. That's what my parents think :P</p>
<p>It was only question number 3. So it was a fairly easy question.</p>
<p>cc3c you think you got the 2400 this time?</p>
<p>if the curve is -1 = 800 for math, then yes. if not, superscore i hope</p>
<p>^ what did you put for the "has shrunk" in W? (sorry for off topic :D)</p>
<p>I will get a 2400 I think if I get an 11-12 essay.</p>