The Best Business Schools 2010 - Bloomsberg Businessweek

<p>the-best-business-schools-2010:</a> Personal Finance News from Yahoo! Finance</p>

<p>Here is the rank for those lazy to link it.</p>

<ol>
<li><p>University of Chicago
Booth School of Business</p></li>
<li><p>Harvard University Business School</p></li>
<li><p>University of Pennsylvania
The Wharton School</p></li>
<li><p>Northwestern University
Kellog School of Management</p></li>
<li><p>Stanford University
Graduate School of Business</p></li>
<li><p>Duke University
Fuqua School of Business</p></li>
<li><p>University of Michigan
Ross School of Business</p></li>
<li><p>University of California, Berkeley
Haas School of Business</p></li>
<li><p>Columbia University
Columbia Business School</p></li>
<li><p>Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Sloan School of Management</p></li>
</ol>

<p>These are all great schools. Keep in mind these rankings are for MBA programs. Many of these schools don’t have undergrad business programs. Keep in mind, too, that an undergrad business degree may not always be the best route to a top MBA program.</p>

<p>I really wish Chicago had an undergraduate business program :frowning: Love the school, just can’t apply because they don’t offer the course I want.</p>

<p>AudreyH: They do. It’s CCIB: Chicago Careers in Business. Students are required to take courses at Booth to graduate from this program. It’s just not a typical, formal undergraduate business program like, say, Wharton.</p>

<p>What? I MUST research that! Thank you phuriku :)</p>

<p>Oh I’m so excited now! :)</p>

<p>I suppose Harvard made the list because so many of its grads performed so competently in the financial sector, and they truly believe in free market competition without government bailouts, fraudulent practices, or the buying of politicians.</p>

<p>@zap LOL</p>

<p>@bclintonk, if you come out of undergrad b-school, you should NOT go back for an
MBA except for an expanded network. I’m at one of the above listed schools for undergrad and our textbook/prof/course outline is exactly the same as for the MBA class.</p>

<p>if this ranking is for MBA, I personally think Duke was ranked too high. It’s number 10 at best, but it’s basically out of the top 10 for most ranking games.</p>

<p>I’d put Haas at #6, bump Sloan to #7, pluck out Tuck from nowhere and place it at #8, Columbia at #9 and Ross at #10. Those the schools that comprise the top 10 for MBA.</p>

<p>rest of the t14:
Yale-SOM, Duke-Fuqua, Cornell-Johnson and UVa-Darden</p>

<p>Next tier:
UCLA-Anderson, CMU-Tepper and Texas-McCombs</p>

<p>sorry; I have forgotten NYU-Stern. It should be in the top 15.</p>

<p>^^I’d keep Michigan just slightly ahead of Berkeley. ;-)</p>

<p>The only thing I would change in this ranking is put Dartmouth at #6 and Duke out of the top 10. :)</p>

<p>Actually, after Harvard, Stanford and Wharton, the next spot is up to the individual applying. There isn’t any clear superior business school after those big3 bschools. I were to make my top 5, my list would look something like this: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Sloan, haas. I’m sure other people would not be attracted to sloan and haas just as I am.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

:rolleyes:</p>

<p>The Most Selective MBA Programs
[The</a> Most Selective MBA Programs | Poets and Quants](<a href=“http://poetsandquants.com/2010/11/02/the-most-selective-mba-programs-in-the-u-s/]The”>http://poetsandquants.com/2010/11/02/the-most-selective-mba-programs-in-the-u-s/)</p>

<p>School Percentage Accepted Average GMAT

  1. Stanford 6.5% 726
  2. Berkeley (Haas) 11.0% 718
  3. Harvard 12.2% 719
  4. MIT (Sloan) 14.2% 711
  5. NYU (Stern) 14.5% 717
  6. Columbia 14.9% 713
  7. UPenn (Wharton) 16.9% 718
  8. Yale 18.0% 715
  9. Dartmouth (Tuck) 18.8% 712
  10. Northwestern (Kellogg) 19.5% 706
  11. California-Davis 21.0% 684
  12. USC (Marshall) 22.0% 690
  13. Cornell (Johnson) 22.3% 700
  14. Texas A&M (Mays) 22.7% 652
  15. Michigan (Ross) 23.4% 701
  16. Texas-Austin (McCombs) 23.4% 681
  17. Georgia Institute of Tech 23.6% 684
  18. Florida (Hough) 24.6% 684
  19. Chicago (Booth) 24.8% 714
  20. UCLA (Anderson) 25.0% 711
  21. Virginia (Darden) 25.4% 701
  22. Connecticut 26.0% 621
  23. Georgia (Terry) 26.0% 646
  24. Arizona State (Carey) 27.0% 673
  25. Calif.-Irvine (Merage) 27.2% 675</p>

<p>^And your point is? Similarly, the undergrad selection rate for lower Ivies+Duke+UChicago range ~14%. HYPSM is ~9%. Berkeley is 22% and UCLA is 21%.</p>

<p>Following whatever you’re trying to prove (quality based on selectivity?), Berkeley doesn’t compare at all to the lower Ivies + UCLA even.</p>

<p>EDIT:The article even indicates location is probably the primary factor for high selectivity, not quality…</p>

<p>Post-MBA Pay (5 years) </p>

<p>120,000 - Stanford
110,000 - Berkeley-Haas
110,000 - Harvard
100,000 - Wharton
110,000 - MIT-Sloan</p>

<p>105,000 - Northwestern-Kellogg
105,000 - Dartmouth-Tuck</p>

<p>102,000 - Chicago-Booth</p>

<p>100,000 - Columbia
100,000 - Michigan-Ross
100,000 - NYU-Stern
100,000 - Duke-Fuqua
100,000 - Yale SOM
100,000 - Virginia-Darden
100,000 - UCLA-Anderson</p>

<p>MrPrince, YOU ARE RANTING ON A WRONG THREAD. lol</p>

<p>^Actually, I’m not. The point was to inform people of Bloomsberg news. You just randomly posted some old rankings based on selectivity without making a point yourself. Technically you are posting on the wrong thread…</p>

<p>^ old rankings? If this was an old ranking, then blame the OP for posting this. LOL</p>

<p>Having said that, finish high school first then come back here.</p>

<p>Stanford should be ranked above HBS. All the other school looks right.</p>