The C Student from Andover & Yale!

<p>How pathetic! John Kerry & GW Bush, were both Satanic Skull & Bones Members at Yale, the secretive society with people well entrenched in the halls of power everywhere. Whats happening to our democracy? Where is the real choice for the people?</p>

<p>Dr. Strangelove ( Dick Cheney ) is running the Country while W. drives past Miss Sheehan to go chop some wood & kill Squirrels!</p>

<p>
[quote]
How can I change it? Bush is *****, Kerry wasn't as good as I would like, and Nader, well his mind was in another place. Look who I have to vote for. And I do plan on applying for president. EVERYONE VOTE KINGLIN
I'm FBLA district vice president, so I would be a good US president.</p>

<p>Running for President
uvajoe
hazmat
kinglin
greendayfan</p>

<p>Honestly, I think the reason Bush has a problem speaking is because he doesn't know what he's talking about. "We as a nation to bring about a better economy, providing more jobs, raising income, and lowering CPI....UMMMMMM <em>thinks to self-what is CPI?</em>
kinglin is offline<br>

[/quote]
</p>

<p>as an American Citizen you have Many ways to change it.</p>

<p>Here an Option. Just assassinat him if you dont like him so much.</p>

<p>Kerry was not the lesser of two evils; rather Bush was the evil of two lessers...</p>

<p>assassinat?</p>

<p>What's that?</p>

<p>Its how some radical republicans think we should remove the remaining democrats from office, without having to appeal to those pesky minorities.</p>

<p>you really can't make a very good argument that Yale did a bad job admitting a student that went on to be President.</p>

<p>seriously. It doesn't matter if you don't like Bush, but there have only been 43 US Presidents. How many schools would love to have a President of the US on their list of alumni? Answer: All of them.</p>

<p>If you are 17 and honestly think you can make better decisions than a US President with years in politics, please get a reality check. There's more to decision making than you realize. Issues are not clear cut.</p>

<p>No s**** sherlock. But considering where I am now, and where Bush was in collge and high school, in terms of intelligence, I think in 40 years I could do a much better job.</p>

<p>Yeah but you are from Florida, good luck from the Central states.</p>

<p>I meant assassinate, I missed a E. Im sorry KInglin.
If you dont like the Guy do somthing about it.</p>

<p>To many women, who cliam to be men these days.</p>

<p>DMK, if you cant handle being the most powerful and Most loved or Mosted Hated person in the World, then by all means, Go ahread. It takes a Strong man for that Job.</p>

<p>Good Luck</p>

<p>I really dont see what the complaint is against Bush, I think he is doing a great Job.</p>

<p>Why are we in Iraq?
Dahm we thoght it was for WMD. But we still found a Huge number of suspects for terrorism. Oh yeah, and if they were not, they wouldent be resisting the way they are and killing their own people.</p>

<p>We should Leave Iraq now?<br>
Yeah and ya know what will happen, the same thing that happened when we left and no longer supported afghanistan while they had problems with Russia.
Oh **** that would be mass American hatred.</p>

<p>The Iraqi people dont want us their?
If they didnt the majority 70.3% would not have voted, risking death or injury from insurgents.</p>

<p>I can answer any question you give me to support Bush.</p>

<p>You Democrats have to relize, you cant sit back and be Nuetral, It didnt work in the 80 and 90;s, and wont work in the 2000's. Its impossible just to sit here and deal with problems when they happen. Not going to happen, sorry.</p>

<p>"DMK, if you cant handle being the most powerful and Most loved or Mosted Hated person in the World, then by all means, Go ahread. It takes a Strong man for that Job."-I think you meant can.</p>

<p>The reason we found so many terrorists is because they flooded in from saudi arbabia and Syria as a result of our invasion. As for the war, I will say what I said in another board,"
Yes Iraq was pretty screwed up before we went to war. But guess what, whether its a week or ten years, everything will fall apart when we leave. These people have been fighting for God knows how long, theyve been holding grudges for generations. It is the height of arrogance to think we could waltz in and end the blood feuds by playing peacekeeper for a few years. There are only two ways the fighting will stop, either we kill massive numbers of Iraqis and become the oppressive empire they accuse us of being, or they decide to stop of their own volition. If you don't believe me, think about this...It took us four years to defeat the axis in World War II, what was then the other most powerful force on the planet. It took Britain and her allies about four years to defeat the triple entente. How long have we been in Iraq?</p>

<p>Yes, many Iraqi's are normal citizeens just trying to live their lives, but too many of them who waive American flags have ak-47's and rpgs in their closets waiting for the next ungaurded convoy. As for what Bush has done wrong, how come he didn't heed his Generals' warnings and go in with enough troops to destroy all oppisition before it had a chance to go underground. He sure had enough support at the start of this war to do that. What made FDR and others good presidents is they knew enough to appoint qualified people and to listen to their advice.</p>

<p>ytes thats what I meant, sorry</p>

<p>I have 4 guns in my house, as you all should.</p>

<p>If they all game down from saudi arabi, then thats a good thing. 11 or 12 i forget the number of 9/11 terrorists were from saudi arabia.</p>

<p>Yes it will take time, but id say its worth it. may not be to you.</p>

<p>Its already been said this operation will take 8+ years.</p>

<p>Bush still has a little under 4 years, to make the situation ok and to see it out. </p>

<p>In 3+ years when we vote again, the country will not vote for a Democrat during war time, if we are still their.</p>

<p>so its not a big problem.</p>

<p>BTW, its not that bad in Iraq, a NYT artcile said that the crime rating were lower in baghdad. than the majority of American cities, in Northwester and Southern America.</p>

<p>so its actually safer their than living here as a Civilian.</p>

<p>The fact is unless you have served or visited their, you have no idea about the situation. Because what you see in the media can be manipulated, to the furthest extent./</p>

<p>"I have 4 guns in my house, as you all should.</p>

<p>If they all game down from saudi arabi, then thats a good thing. 11 or 12 i forget the number of 9/11 terrorists were from saudi arabia."
Wow, oyur father keeps guns with a kid in the house. That is pretty irresponsible. So Unearth, why didn't we invade Saudi Arabia, that country is almost as screwed up as Iraq was before the war, they have oil, and they definitely harbor terrorists.</p>

<p>umm we get a **** load of oil from saudi arabia. its our #1 suplier</p>

<p>and how is it irresponsible to have guns, Id think it would be irssesonsible Not to own a Gun in America.</p>

<p>^^Unearth, where do you live? Do you live in the middle of a violent and drug infested neighborhood where teenagers get killed everyday? If so, then I'll understand your position on guns and fully support your position.</p>

<p>However, not all of us feel the need to own a gun. I live in a neighborhood where a baseball bat is more than enough in terms of self defense.</p>

<p>Then again... if I lived in a terrible place... then holy crap, I'm getting a gun. If there are little kids around, I'm locking the guns up and storing the gun away from the ammo.</p>

<p>If you live in the nice suburbs where all of your neighbors are nice enough to say hi when you pass them on a morning run, then I don't see why it would be "irresponsible to not own a gun in America."</p>

<p>I don't have too much of a problem with the .22 low velocity pistols they have out there, but I think having something like a .44 magnum or a desert eagle is just overdoing it. You want to defend yourself, not blow off the other guy's shoulder.</p>

<p>By the way, I'm just curious.... What are the 4 guns you own? Can you give me the caliber, muzzle velocity, and type of ammo used? Thanks!</p>

<p>Oh...... I have another question for you Unearth.</p>

<p>Do you by any chance know the states where the 14-round clip for the Desert Eagle is legal? I know that a lot of places outlaw the 14 round clip and only allow the 8 round one.</p>

<p>I'm trying to win a bet =)</p>

<p>Oh, just to clarify. I'm talking about the .44 caliber Desert Eagle (since it's the only one where the standard size is 8 rounds... the .357 has a standard of 9 rounds and the .50 has 7 rounds)</p>

<p>I live in Bronx, NY-Not so bad.</p>

<p>I dont know anything about firearms. My father owns them, and he is a Hunter and collects them.</p>

<p>I play counter strike and that has a deagle in it. Thats about all i know about them.</p>

<p>Do you understand the reason why we are given the right to bear arms, in the US Constitution.</p>

<p>I really think you have the wrong understanding.</p>

<p>Gun Control always works, if ya know what I mean.</p>

<p>if not I can explain.</p>

<p>The US constitution gave us the right to bear arms so we could form a militia and defend ourselves. At the time it was intended for us to defend our country from outsiders. However, nowadays, it seems we have guns to protect ourselves from each other</p>

<p>And what do you mean by "Gun control always works"? Could you be a bit more specific?</p>

<p>Random thing: I think the 14 round clip is illegal in New York =)</p>

<p>Today we have the right to bear arms, to protect the people from goverment take over. Extreme Martial law and enslavement. Same as it was</p>

<p>"Gun control works" is a term to describe dictators suchs as Hitler, Stalin, Castro, Qaddafi, KIm-jong ill, ide amin, pol Pot.</p>

<p>All men who ran their dictatoships, ruthlessly and destroyed the people.</p>

<p>All of these people were not allowed to own Guns. Sounds like germany in the 1940's or **** thats Africa and North Korea Now.</p>

<p>So you guys tell me, Guns are not Important to America. This is why the NRA has been one of the most influential groups in American History.</p>

<p>What I simply mean by the term. Is that Gun control always works. Poeple are defenceles, under a state of Martial Law or corrupt faciest dictorship.</p>

<p>Ummm, noooooooooo. The original reason the framers put the right to bear arms in the constitution was so farmers and other citizens could defend themselves against invasion from french, british, or Indians. In todays modern military, if a country chose to invade a shotgun wouldnt make much of a difference, not against a tank, plane, or marine with an mg. If you were taught that, then your history teacher doesnt know much more then what is taught in basic curriculums. My family has a few american history buffs, so I have access to some really good resources. But Im not for gun control. I just think its irresponsible to own guns in the same household your raising a kid. But you are right, it is a free country. And if I owned a 7-11 in a bad neighberhood, I would definitely consider having something under the counter.</p>