<p>I just saw a post about someone claiming they 'swamped with work' and consequently received a C in Calc. That led me to this question:</p>
<p>Given the importance of ECs, as long as an applicant challenges him/herself with their course selection, does it really matter so much if the applicant hangs around the mid to high B to low A range IF and ONLY IF they are REALLY succeeding in some EC? </p>
<p>Colleges give nationally ranked athletes a break on their grades because of their great committment to an athletic activity. Does that custom apply to kids who really work and succeed in music, art, debate, speech, etc?</p>
<p>So - let's universalize this - when figuring out how to spend your precious time in high school, do you find a nice balance b/c ECs and academics (so near the top of the class, but not on top), do you go hardcore academics (get on top of the class) and do a few but not very meaningful ECs, or do you do what I first questioned about - focus on the ECs and get low As and/or mid to high Bs?</p>
<p>I think at this point in time, we know that the 'well-rounded' idea is fallacious, and that one needs to be well rounded PLUS a nice other activity. So the question is... how far do you go in your ECs?</p>