@gcf101 I actually used that strategy here xD (I used again after reading your post and I end up with the right answer) What took me so long (by so long I mean 2 mins, and I think that’s too much) was that I cannot even find out the function. LOL
I suffer with functions of phrases, words, and punctuation marks (quotation marks!!), to be specific.
I’ve gotten better at finding functions of words and phrases (I got them all correct in practice so far) - but quotation marks? I still get those almost always wrong :S
Here are the two questions on quotation marks that appeared so far (got them both wrong)
- (p.201) Like all good satire, the mock headline comes perilously close to the truth. Modern Luddites do indeed invent “machines”–in the form of viruses, cyberworms, and other malware–to disrupt the technologiesthat trouble them.
Before I looked at the answer choices, I thought:
“machines” are obviously negative in this sense, given the examples that follow. So quotation marks here are used to show that “machines” aren’t good things.
Choices:
(A) cast doubt on a theory
(B) defend an unpopular notion
© emphasize a contrast
(D) indicate a specialized definition of a term
(E) condemn a behavior
So right away, I eliminated A (machines isn’t a theory), B (nothing is being defended), and E (tricky, but the author neither condemns nor discusses machines as “behavior”. He just says machines are harmful - and condemn is too extreme for our case)
Now C and D… I was really confused. D makes a lot of sense, but what really “ruined” it for me was “definition” - mahcines IS used in a specialized way (as indicated by the quotation marks) - but what exactly “indicates a specialized DEFINITION of a term” are the dashes, which contain the definition. I believe the quotes were used to “highlight a term with a specialized definition” because we had the word itself in the quotes.
then I looked at C. I found it ironical that people who were against technology used technology themselves to impede technological progress (Too much techno here xD) so the quotes might as well emphasize that irony? Anyway, I know irony is not equal to contrast. The other choice was ruined by “Definition” imo, so I picked this one because all the choices seemed wrong to me anyway.
and I was wrong.
The correct answer is D. I don’t understand why though? @gcf101 @marvin100 Can you please “correct” my thinking?
- (p.186) No one liked the fudging, but because it led to such stunningly accurate answers, scientists couldn’t dismiss it. In the reigning paradigm in physics today–which describes the working of invisible “fields” (similar to magnetic fields)—would not exist without this hand weaving.
The author uses quotation marks in “fields” in order to:
(B) present a novel approach
(D) imply skepticism about a concept
I also got confused here. “Now” and “today” implied that the fields idea was recent, so I picked B. The answer is D and I understand why D is correct. (-ve attitude towards fields in “hand weaving”, “fudging”, so skepticism about fields) I still don’t know exactly why is B wrong though.
My issue is… OK - I understand why is the correct answer correct, but I also still get those questions specifically wrong, so I need to know what is that mistake I do each time, but I can’t really figure it out (and these questions take too much time to be solved!!)
I managed to have clear “steps” for functions of words and phrases, but I can’t come up with something for quotation marks, except this tip:
I need to make sure that what follows the “function verb” (s.a. present, imply) is a general counterpart of the quoted word - for example, fields: concept, and machines: term.