<p>"
Your mom was NOT expected to use her savings when YOU went to college. Her savings were below the protected amount for a parent (who isn’t going to college).</p>
<p>However, since YOU (the student) earned a lot of money, YOU were expected to use a good portion of THAT money towards your education.</p>
<p>You were given a highish EFC because YOU (the dependent student) earned a lot of money.</p>
<p>If you would stop confusing apples and oranges, this would all make sense.</p>
<p>Also…you may have been going to a school that didn’t meet need. Most schools cannot meet need. That’s why many choose to start at a CC and then commute to a local state school."</p>
<p>I’m not confusing apples and oranges.</p>
<p>I’m talking about two different situations.</p>
<p>My freshman year, I did not have any money at all, and I was told that I did not qualify for any need-based grants. After that, yes, I decided to work and earned about $8 - 12k/year mostly over the summers which I did indeed put into school. Would I have liked to study more during the school year? Yes. But since I didn’t get grants my first year, I knew it was far too risky to count on grants based on need.</p>
<p>And when we asked why, they did tell us, that my mother’s assets (part of a house, savings in the bank) counted against us.</p>
<p>The same for a person going on their own.</p>
<p>Again, I am NOT trying to say, “Therefore, this is the same situation.”</p>
<p>What I am saying is, “Here are three different situations of people that really have to sacrifice to go to school, and we got denied need-based aid in every instance. This leads me to believe that need-based aid is only for the poorest of the poor, because if you had any less, you would truly be on the brink of homelessness.”</p>
<p>That is FINE with me. However, I think it’s silly to say that somehow, someone could get need-based aid with two working parents. There’s just no way, unless they had a lot of brothers and sisters in college.</p>