No. There is no hypothetical true equivalence among candidates and as this is holistic, the commentary matters, too. The real problem is the quality of the apps/supps, LoRs, interview and what actually comes across. This varies. Any use of numbers ratings is just one shorthand, not the final disposition. And don’t forget institutional needs also come into play- sorry, they will not take every bright kid from the Bay Area. Or Stuy. Or imbalance their class with more stem majors and no one to humanities depts. Etc.
And black applicants do not get into all Ivies more often. Maybe you’re referring to some few media darlings.