<p>It is predicted that by 2100 a world government will be established. Do you think that makes all the wars that have been fought about border issues obsolete? Knowing this fact (my first statment) will you fight in any war involving a conflict between your nation and a rival, today? Will nationalists and politicians on the right become the laughing-stock of future generations?</p>
<p>^None of us will be alive in 2100…</p>
<p>First we don’t we will be long gone and will be “ancient” history. Second, a world government will be the fall of mankind. There will be no different cultures, and way of life unique to each other. This is going on right now with globalization. There may still be wars on borders, or conflicts. Such as which state/province or whatever, should have this amount of land or whatever. One government is dumb. There will be a lack of competition and other things. It wouldn’t last long.</p>
<p>Well, there’s no telling what will happen by 2100. Anyway, it would depend, for me. There are some cases of nationalism (Tiocfaidh </p>
<p>human nature will never change. </p>
<p>the superpowers will have more say in the world government, the small countries will have little say. </p>
<p>problems will still haunt us</p>
<p>No wars means no people. Were animals, and animals fight for what they want. its human nature to want more or to be better then the person next to you. A one government would fail. And I would be surprised if humans last that long.</p>
<p>wars will be replaced by flamewars</p>
<p>It doesn’t matter. </p>
<p>The world’s ending in 2 years anyway…</p>
<p>Our world will be like the one in Anthem by Ayn Rand.</p>
<p>Politicians are ruining the world as they are motivated by a thirst for power-hungry greed.</p>
<p>
Ehh, maybe none of us here, but quite a few people alive today will be alive in 2100. I’d only have to be 108 (and I have relatives who have lived to that age), and some of us would be younger. Considering that human lifespan tops out, at current, around 120 and that people who live to 110 are now common enough to no longer come to any degree of notoriety, it’s nearly certain that a couple of people approximately our age today will live to see the next century.</p>
<p>^Not to mention the possibility of scientifically increasing lifespans. Or the occasional astronaut traveling at near-light-speed.</p>
<p>I can’t imagine learning history in another hundred years 
It’s bad enough that the current textbook is already couple hundred pages long.</p>
<p>I never did like history class, future class seems more important. Like “HOW TO PREDICT THE FUTURE 101”, I could get an A there.</p>
<p>GOOGLE WILL OWN THE INTERNET, CREATE IT’S OWN COUNTRY, THE SKYS WILL BE FULL OF ADDS</p>
<p>FIRST ASIAN PRESIDENT OF AMERICA in 2034</p>
<p>AND I WANT A ROBOT APOCALYPSE! (much shinier than the zombie kind)</p>
<p>^Yep, and you’ll make millions :] (Or be labeled as oddly disturbed in the mind…)</p>
<p>Wait, you know its 2010, weren’t we supposed to have flying cars, colonized the moon, and everyone have robots as servants. I’m still waiting for that flying car.</p>
<p>[Terrafugia</a> - Transition® the Roadable Light Sport Aircraft : The Company](<a href=“http://www.terrafugia.com/about_us.html]Terrafugia”>http://www.terrafugia.com/about_us.html)</p>
<p>Flying cars. Only $194,000.</p>
<p>Except it’s more of a plane that just happens to be able to drive on highways as opposed to a car capable of vertical takeoff, low-altitude flight, and automobile-like handling. So it’s not really what we expected.</p>
<p>^Woah. Cartoons do inspired new ideas.</p>
<p>“and everyone have robots as servants” -> We do.</p>
<p>Flying cars sound very unsafe.</p>