<p>UW in my honest oopinion</p>
<p>UW and rank. UW to see how well you did absolutely and rank to see relative performance.</p>
<p>what if you just slept through all classes during high school and had a perfect 2400 on the SAT, 800/800/800 in SAT IIs?</p>
<p>What if you show us one of these people first?</p>
<p>Seriously though, that person would exemplify academic immaturity that most likely would be recognized by selective schools’ admissions and promptly rejected. The lazy SAT freak would be a fine experiment for the publics. The ultra selectives won’t risk offering admission to him/her.</p>
<p><uw and=“” rank.=“” uw=“” to=“” see=“” how=“” well=“” you=“” did=“” absolutely=“” rank=“” relative=“” performance.=“”></uw></p>
<p>Yes. So the guy who took all regular classes with 4.0 would trump over the guy who took all APs and got 3.5. It definitely shows how well you did.</p>
<p>Usually rank is based on weighted GPA.</p>