<p>Never far from the bait, I see. I think everyone else understood 314's "just like..." comment was said with a wink and a respectful nod. OK,,, everybody but one. Glad to see you continue to be ever-vigilant.</p>
<p>You're busy involved with comparing Apples to Oranges, and insinuating, statistically .... what?</p>
<p>Group III ("Bull") majors at Your Beloved (Economics, English, History, or Political Science) represent about 35% of the Academy's Upperclass). I Since USMMA doesn't offer "Bull" majors, it seems that you are saying that even Your Beloved's "Bull" majors have more engineering required?? Math/Chemistry/Physics appear pretty consistent... </p>
<p>OK.. I'll bite (but for the life I me I wonder why I bother)</p>
<p>Let's look closer, past the 'sound bite'. For English Bull majors, engineering required includes:
EN200-Principles of Ship Performance -- Intro to ship systems, including basic methods of ship procurement, construction, and power plant selection.
EM300-Principles of Propulsion... energy conversion and basic operation of steam, gas turbine, and internal combustion power plants.
EE301-Introduction to AC & DC circuit theory appropirate to model shipboard systems.
EE302-Digital Comm & computer technology-- Basic principles or digital logic circuitry are introduced The principles of analog and digital comm are presented, including some common digital modulation tehniques. ... Other topics include network topology, connectivity, routing, queuing, bandwidth, spectrum utilization, TCPIP and the internet.
ES419- Wepsons System Engineering -- an introduction to applications of RADAR, SONAR, ... principles used in the control of weapons systems.</p>
<p>Yup..
I guess you are hanging your whole argument on.... an English Major taking intro/survey courses to 1) Buying/building a ship, 2) Selecting something to make it go (hopefully fast-ish), 3) that there are digital and analog systems and routers/internet on board, and 4) that the NAVY uses RADAR and SONAR.
(smile-- actually, I am unfairly summarizing the Catalog descriptions,
but...
I don't think foreign terrorists are going to be cowed into submission know that some kid in English is an expert at some of the electives....
HE301 -- Patterns in Drama
HE203 -- Forms of Poetry
HE306 -- Types of Fiction
HE315 -- Satire and Sensibility in the Age or Reason (1660-1780)
HE319 -- The Victorian Frame of Mind</p>
<hr>
<p>And NOWHERE does the experience of Sea Year ( a year at sea doing it all AND integrating what you would refer to as a CAPSTONE-style project ) filter into your BGO classroom grids? You understand ONE of the Academies sooo well, and another one not so much (although that doesn't seems to give you much pause from sharing comments)</p>
<p>You are doing yourself a disservice not be be frank in fair in your statements. Now, don't get me wrong.. you've got the 'frank' part of that pair nailed down... It's the other part that seems to present some difficulty.</p>
<p>You have SUCH good information to share, and such GREAT experiences, it is a shame so many have just skipped your posts due to their bias and, well, prickliness. You seem, however, to be singularly alone in your broad contributions to the numerous service academy forums. But I appreciate your input, even when I have to discard all the colorings/shadings of the charged phrases you employ.</p>
<p>These forums have been such a wealth of support and information for all.. And I have benefited from the great information as well as the shared misery. I do not wish to engage is any prolonged discussion of 'who's better'. That would completely MISS the point -- I won't wrestle with the pig.. I won't win, and it annoys the pig ;) .</p>
<p>I know some EXCELLENT Midshipmen at the Naval Academy -- 4 stripers, pilot wanna-bes, other brilliant & stellar individuals.. And I am heartened at their commitment to serve. And I am saddened by some of the news of Mids who do NOT wear that service and commitment to honor in their hearts, bringing shame to their Academy by 'conduct unbecoming' and courts-martial. Abundant athletic talent in one area should not lower the bar in another for moral leadership. I will grant that all Academies wrestle with this.</p>
<p>I know some EXCELLENT Midshipmen at the Merchant Marine Academy -- pilot wanna-bes, other brilliant & stellar and honorable individuals. And I am heartened by their commitment to serve. </p>
<p>Were one to step foot on the grounds of BOTH Academies, one would recognize it as well.</p>
<p>--</p>
<p>I will NOT disrespect any of the academies, nor the ROTC programs, nor any other selection process. These kids work exceedingly hard, are remarkably dedicated, and I celebrate the honor they bring to themselves, and how they represent our nation. I have seen MANY of their former friends and what is happening to them in colleges. (Not that our kids don't have their own warts and problems... I'll just find some way of encouraging them to do better)</p>
<p>Nor will I be an apologist, somehow allowing any vague sense of superiority or inferiority to color my posts. If I have a bias, it for ALL these academies..</p>
<p>I will simply understand that NOT all paths to service must lead through ONE, "best" gate. And certainly not ALL who proceed through that gate are better than ANY who proceed through other gates. Were that the case, there would only be ONE path. The Navy understands that, and commissions accordingly. There have been STELLAR leaders from ALL commissioning sources.</p>
<p>So, I encourage us ALL to try to add our 2 cents in, with the underlying goal of trying to be helpful, not just 'win' some argument (gosh, if I wanted to see that, I'd just watch some Congressional Coverage on cable ;) )</p>