Oh, I get it, @Penn95 - you’re rereading and reacting to post #299, where I said the following:
I stand by what I said - notwithstanding that Stanford’s a clear peer of HYP, it would do HYP (and particularly H) no good to admit it in this way. I wasn’t making an argument about relative prestige - again, I think that’s a subject for many other threads (see, for example, @Hunt’s genius invention of “prestigiosity” as measured in “milliHarvards”, or “mH”).