<p>@applicannot</p>
<p>we mean no offence by this, but it has been decided that, as they are three different rounds, they will be on 3 diff threads. Why don’t you make a point on SCEA thread if you feel bad abt it?</p>
<p>And by no means has anyone challenged your qualification.</p>
<p>Applicannot I agree that it is stupid to have two threads for the same purpose but I believe the thought process is that they are two different pools of applicants</p>
<p>I don’t feel bad about it, I just think it’s pointless and NOT useful to next year’s applicants, which is pretty much the point.</p>
<p>what’s pointless and not useful to people next year is this chatter we have in between people posting their decisions. maybe just make a new thread somewhere else anyway.</p>
<p>@mfed/applican (:P) well </p>
<p>A. it wont be difficult to add all 2 reported QB decisions to the actual SECA decisions thread.</p>
<p>B. There will be alot of chatter between now and the decision date on this thread which imo is more degenerative to the threads origional purpose: to be useful to next year’s applicants</p>
<p>C (and most importantly) Prussia! called dibs…</p>
<p>I was waiting for Prussia to show up here and claim her territory or for someone to mention her.</p>
<p>i agree with the arguments
esp with prussia calling dibs</p>
<p>maybe Prussia can put the right name and make it the “The Official Stanford REA Decisions - Class of 2014” </p>
<p>no offense to sarbaraj. but we dont want to get ourselves mixed up with yale now do we? </p>
<p>:P</p>
<p>I am so scared that my acceptance is false. I can’t wait for the letter!</p>