This Thread will have #1000 by 05/07/07

<p>Mickey's dog of course :p</p>

<p>Well, I should be going to bed now... bye, anorexia person.</p>

<p>Bye bye naidu...and I expect you to tell me where your name comes from...i believe mine is pretty conspicuous!!
:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p
TOP THAT</p>

<p>wt/<em>fdtgfg</em>/f no one's online. oh sh/<em>gfhffh</em>/it!</p>

<p>^yup i can skip the censor now:D</p>

<p>hEY DEBATE ADDICT!! WANNA DEBATE? I"LL BEAT YOU EVEN IF WE DEBATE IN GREEK, EVEN THOUGH GREEK IS...WELL GREEK TO ME</p>

<p>Man WE GOTTA STOP THIS THREAD FROM REACHING 2000!!</p>

<p>Lets debate!! Choose a topic</p>

<p>I'm waiting...we can have the ppl here as judges...but bear in mind that I gtg in 30 minutes so be fast!</p>

<p>yea. sorry didnt see that..</p>

<p>ok a topic.....um um um.... use of wt/<em>fgfg</em>/f in CC, should it be censored or not?</p>

<p>I speak against it. wt/<em>dggff</em>/f is a natural exclaimation of the mind. It is not uncommon in today's society, let alone chatrooms, and yes, Prominent Websites.
CC's over-conservative policy for students, who in the 1st place are familiar with more advanced words, should not apply to wt/<em>dffff</em>/f.</p>

<p>Interesting topic:
My stance is no.</p>

<p>*** stands for a concept rather than an insult. When we vocalize *** we use it in a metaphorical manner that does not impact negatively upon others, aka it is not an insult. Examining the very nature of *** it is obvious that as an American idiom, it expresses a quandary, and in general it is used to show that one person is startled. </p>

<p>Lets compare it to other instances with similar words but different connotations. Mother f* is used to curse at somebody, and the ramifications of using this word are conspicuous. The connotation is a negative one and therefore it is only rational to censor such a profane word. Nevertheless, expressing astonishment through a slang word should not be prohibited. After all, even though some may say that it is informal, informal use of language is not restricted in the rules of procedure. </p>

<p>To sum up, NO</p>

<p>ok 1st of all, u're being censored man! hahahahahaha</p>

<p>And n e way, look at Technorati, uses W T F all the time. The point is it is turning out to be not just an expression of shock, but also is no more related to its original meaning(mother f<em>, as my unworthy adversary mentioned earlier, lol sorry bout that)
It no more bears any relation to its original meaning, which is related to intercourse.
As an example, "kick this f</em><strong>ing thing" , "What the </strong> is going on?", "Un**inglievable".</p>

<p>So my stance is YES!! It should be allowed, w t f atleast</p>

<p>since we agree there is no point!!</p>

<p>we have to find a different topic.
where r u from?</p>

<p>lol u agree to....</p>

<p>India, and another country which i havent declared</p>

<p>of course
ok, i dont think we will have time...i'll be back in 5-6 hours...maybe u r still here</p>

<p>Unworthy adversary huh??
ok, i'll give u a topic....drug legalization.....choose your side and we'll debate on this thread when i find u online again..keep posting though</p>

<p>how bout a debate thread eh?</p>

<p>^drug legalization? that aint fun either. </p>

<p>How bout...um...spending loads of time on CC Cafe, good or bad?</p>

<p>Amazing. debate thread</p>