<p>What would harvard do if they had a student apply to there school, if the school they came from had a higher SAT average then harvard.</p>
<p>I mean if a kid had a 3.87 and 1550 he would be in the top 40%. That would really suck. I mean if they take the top 20% they would have taken all 4.0/1600. I think these kind of schools are great for personal acheivement and overall college placement, but for the very elite school admissions, i think it kinda hurts. I mean the school even has a wikipedia entry.</p>
<p>imagine a school whose average sat is almost 1500. That is crazy i mean totally crazy. The lowest person must have like a 1350 or something. Must have a stellar student body.</p>
<p>but then again, these people came from amazing family backgrounds. i think colleges will look at students' credentials in the context of their background (schooling, family, income, etc)</p>
<p>but i think they should not be held to a different standard, since not only is an A an A for these kids (unlike grade inflated high schools), but they have so much competition and their classes move so fast. I think that a good half of their school should be accepted to the Ivy league since they obviously are the epitome of high school education.</p>
<p>Who's to say that the students who have Ivy-level stats don't get admitted into at least one school in the top 10? Perhaps they didn't all get admitted into Harvard, but there's a school that doesn't guarantee acceptance, no matter what stats you have or where you are from. It would seem that those who can't keep up with the pace, by a minimal amount, who don't have Ivy-level stats but are still good students, attend UVA, a very good school itself (25% attend according to the Wikipedia article).</p>