First, I appreciate the help over a couple threads in the last year or so as my daughter’s college journey has played out. Now that we are essentially rounding third, and she has visited pretty widely, the focus is switching from finding schools to “building” the application list. I would appreciate thoughts on that aspect for those kind enough to share their time.
For background, UMC non minority female from a single sex catholic school in fly over country. The school does not pump a lot of students “back east” for college, so Naviance data is sparse at best for many schools on her list. Kenyon being a notable exception which becomes important below. Stats are an uw 3.9(ish) on a 93-100 scale (1 B+), 7 APs by the time she is done, 34 ACT (single sitting), maybe NMSF, school does not rank but certainly in the top 5% or so. Decent to good ECs. Lots of theater for this area, 2 school productions plus 1 or 2 community productions per year (I think she is in her 11th play right now). 3 year marching band kid (gave it up this year to perform in the play she is opening in tonight), 4 year jazz band, 4 year member/2 year president of key club, a few other random clubs, sings in the church choir, some volunteering but not a ton, works a couple shifts a week at a local restaurant beginning in junior summer. She is not a great writer, but does have a voice. Essays will be neutral at worst. Recommendations letters will be good, maybe really good.
The forming list is Wesleyan/Vassar early decision. One will be ED1 and the other ED2 if necessary. She is going back to each this fall for overnights to hopefully break the tie. Then Swarthmore/Tufts RD. To this point, the list is locked and she is going to apply to these four schools. The messy part comes next. There are five schools that we are calling “low matches” Kenyon, Bryn Mawr, Dickinson, Skidmore, Franklin and Marshall. These are schools where her stats are well above the 75th percentile and the last available data shows an overall female acceptance rate of at least 37% (excepting Kenyon, where the Naviance data shows that girls with her stats do well). There are two schools which are scholarship safeties, Loyola Chicago and Fordham. Fordham will be a safety if she makes NMSF. Loyola has a competitive scholarship, so we won’t know if it will function as a safety until after applications are in. Two “true” safeties, Canisus and Otterbein, round out the list. She loves each of the schools on the locked part of the list and is at least luke warm to mildly positive on each of the remaining schools. The issue is that the “true” safety schools are the schools she likes the least, and also are the most expensive, likely requiring some level of loans. The remainder of her list is populated with schools where it is likely she will not need to borrow money to graduate.
Her plan has been to apply to five or six schools, max. Her mother and I agree, and prefer that she do a few applications well rather than several poorly. So we have the four locked schools, plus a true safety (assuming no NMSF status) and then maybe either Loyola Chicago or one of her low matches. I am toying with the idea of telling her that instead of forcing her to apply to one of the true safeties, she has to commit to apply to at least three of the low match schools. While this would increase the number of total applications to seven, I also think it increases the chances that she lands at a place where she can truly flourish. Then again, I am nervous about the bottom of her list being schools like Bryn Mawr and Kenyon, because generally speaking admission to those places is not a push over. Any thoughts would be appreciated.