Time Travel (serious)

<p>Ethics...</p>

<p>Nothing more than double standards. </p>

<p>Hyperbolic</a> Hypocrisy
PETA Senior Vice President MaryBeth Sweetland on her use of insulin, which was tested on animals:</p>

<pre><code>"I'm an insulin-dependent diabetic. Twice a day I take synthetically manufactured insulin that still contains some animal products -- and I have no qualms about it ... I'm not going to take the chance of killing myself by not taking insulin. I don't see myself as a hypocrite. I need my life to fight for the rights of animals."
--Glamour, January 1990
</code></pre>

<p>I also find it funny that I see so many leather shoes at animal rights convention videos.</p>

<p>^ I am a vegetarian and very animal rights driven [including starting an animal rights club at my school]. I HATE PETA with a fiery passion. I happen to have two pit bulls and the founder of PETA said "Anybody who cares about animals will not be affected by a ban on pit bulls."</p>

<p>Sorry... not the right forum but you brought it up lol.</p>

<p>
[quote]
Aren't there hypotheses that there are particles that can go over the speed of light, but not under it?

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Completely useless particles. How do they stop?</p>

<p>animal rights driven...so you're part of the problem then. Your kind is the reason that 50% of all ISEF projects have to be run through 378057987 different committees on animal safety before they can be approved for judging.</p>

<p>Actually, there are particles that theoretically exist that can go faster than the speed of light. The only catch is, they can't go slower. Tachyon</a> - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</p>

<p>
[quote]
animal rights driven...so you're part of the problem then. Your kind is the reason that 50% of all ISEF projects have to be run through 378057987 different committees on animal safety before they can be approved for judging.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Sorry I don't think that helpless animals should be abused for our entertainment / to better ourselves. What makes us higher than them? Nothing.</p>

<p>^ Our intelligence makes us higher than them.</p>

<p>^ Who defines intelligence?</p>

<p>Wait, stone_cutter, what? Why are you differentiating between 'humankind' and 'animals'? Aren't we all animals? :confused:</p>

<p>I'll use a better word: homosapiens</p>

<p>^ Exactly, Poseur.
This isn't the right thread for this though.</p>

<p>Poseur: depends on how you define animals</p>

<p>New thread tiem.</p>