<p>After taking the Lit. test on November, I ended up with a 690. </p>
<p>This means that I now have 730 US History, 710 World History, and 690 Literature for my SAT II's.</p>
<p>They're not bad scores of course, but at the same time not superbly impressive scores either. I've seen that a lot of people here get a couple 800's and high 700's, and my goal is to get at least one high 700 among my SAT II scores.</p>
<p>So I'm going to retake SAT II literature for sure on January, because I believe with just a bit of prep, I can make a substantial score increase. (I'll have to rush it in though)</p>
<p>However, do you guys think it's worth retaking SAT US History? I took IB History of the Americas, and it did a poor job preparing me for the SAT test since the class covered Mexico and Canada instead of mainly on the U.S. My own interest in history in general was what got me a 730, along with some prep before I took the test.</p>
<p>I'm conflicted because I heard from most people that 730 is a great score, but I think with a bit of prep, I can achieve a higher score. It's also more of a guaranteed score increase, since all I need to do is study, while SAT Literature is more uncertain because of the very nature of that test.</p>
<p>Do you guys think that I should retake SAT US History?</p>