to send or not to send?

<p>Hey guys so I took my sat the first time in march. i completely bombed that one so i wont even mention my scores then. my second time i got:
650 r, 640 m, 710 w=1290/2000
I took them again in dec for the third time w/o studying just to see how i wud do and i got.
640 r, 670 m, 660 w=1310/1970
I already sent all my scores to all my schools in case i didnt do well in dec. But do u think i shud submit my dec scores also because i did better in math even though i did worse in the other sections or maybe there are certain schools I should send my scores to while not sending them to others. </p>

<p>Thanks I really appreciate your help. </p>

<p>I applied to Cornell early and got deferred. Then I am applying to Colgate, Lehigh, Bucknell, Syracuse, Emory, Vanderbilt.</p>

<p>I already applied to Indiana and got in and I have yet to hear from Binghamton and Wisconsin.</p>

<p>I don't think you should send them again because super scored, you SAT is higher. It's a 2030. But that's not that different from a 2000. It's 1320 which is not that higher than a 1310. So it doesn't matter if you send them.</p>

<p>well im i dont send them i actually have a 1290 because my old scores were 650 v and 640 m. now i have 640 v 670 m</p>

<p>Ehh. Honestly, it's a difference of 30 points. I would agree with your decision to not send them because I wouldn't waste $9.50 for each college just to show them that I did 30 pointis better on math. If you had improved your scores by 150 or something like that, then I'd think about it. A difference of 30 points is pretty insignifcant and can be attributed to luck. A difference of 150 points is "real" improvement.</p>

<p>thats true but the 30 points would put me in the 25% in math for all of these schools which is either 660 or 670 where i was previously below the 25%.</p>